Bernice Powell Jackson: Spin Doctor
|

We owe a great deal to Bernice Powell
Jackson: If it hadn't been for her, this site might not exist. She
personifies the lies and distortions of the truth that make a site
like this necessary. With no discretion, oversight or accountability,
she single-handedly has made her "witness" the definition for "Spin
Doctor". As mentioned in one of the reviews of her work,
"Bernice Powell Jackson has a consistent
problem with accuracy. Like many people, she prefers playing political
games (communicating thought provoking themes and agendas) without
much thought as to the full accuracy of her comments. While that might
be acceptable behavior for a politician (who most people are naturally
skeptical of), it should be unacceptable for a denominational leader
who people rely on as an honest steward and witness." But, it's not
all bad... after all, we have her to thank for making this site
possible.

Below is a collection of the "Spin
Doctor's" greatest hits that start when this site rolled out in
September, 2003. This page will be updated on a regular basis with the
latest spin.
July 3, 2005
General Synod - Day 3
Updates posted regularly



Farewell Bernice Powell
Jackson
Commentary
From everything I've heard,
Bernice Powell Jackson is an
extremely nice, intelligent
and gracious person - and I
don't have any reason to
doubt that she's been a
faithful steward for our
denomination. Clearly she
has dedicated herself to
pursuing true justice for
those with little or no
voice and her dedication
should be acknowledged -
even by those like myself
that have had serious
concerns about her
leadership. There is more to
her leadership than her
character, though, and one
of the primary reasons this
site was built was to
challenge many of her public
statements that regularly
distorted the truth. While
her pursuit of justice is
admirable, the ends do not
justify the means. While the
political rhetoric that
often plays fast and loose
with the facts may work well
for those in government,
religious leaders like
Jackson should be held to a
higher standard of honesty.

Many of the issues she
promoted, I supported as
well. For instance, her
concern about the lack of
health care for working
Americans and violence in
video games are issues that
everyone should support, but
with honesty.
Her
distortions about health
care coverage at
Wal-Mart did little to help
the very real issue of
health care insurance. There
is no doubt that some video
games are full of violence
but to
sign on to a statement about
specific video games
that hadn't been released
and then to misspell some of
the names only demonstrated
that she really didn't know
what she was signing on to.

Particularly disturbing was
her
distortion of Charles
Pickering's civil rights
record during his judicial
nomination. Instead of
sifting through the
political rhetoric that
accompanies the nomination
process, she jumped on to
the political bandwagon by
linking Pickering to racism
even though his state's own
civil rights activists
(including Medgar Evers
brother, Charles) claimed
that he was a civil rights
champion. Not only does this
do a disservice to those
fighting for civil rights,
it dilutes the message of
others who raise legitimate
civil rights concerns.

Our faithful witness should
not rest on the political
battles between Republicans
and Democrats, liberals and
conservatives. The faithful
witness of our denomination
has to rise above political
rhetoric. Whether it's the
Christian Coalition or the
United Church of Christ, we
are first called to be
honest in our communication.
While I wish Bernice Powell
Jackson the best as she
moves on to a different
stage of her career, we
should all look forward to
the new opportunity we have
to be more honest in
communicating the concerns
of those who do not have a
voice.

-James Hutchins
_______________
 |
|
|
|
|
The Spin Doctor spins it on
Chris Matthews -
December 2004 |

UCC: "CBS, NBC refuse to air church's
television advertisement"



Bernice Powell Jackson on
'Hardball':
"I think we are pointing a finger at
all churches"

Chris Matthews: Do you think that the networks
are smart not to engage in competitive religious advertising - like,
you know, like some TV products - they knock the other products so
they can sell their products more successfully? Do you think religion
should say "those churches are no good, ours is good"? Is that a good
policy for a Christian religion to follow?

Bernice Powell Jackson: Well, I don't think we are trying to
point fingers at any one church and...

CM: Sure you are.

BPJ: No.

CM: (emphatically) Oh come on. You're showing a bunch of brown
shirts, you're showing people in crew cuts - they look like bouncers
in a nightclub...

BPJ: Right.

CM: ...shoving people away who happen to be African-Americans
or apparently gay - gay couples - and you're saying you're not
pointing a finger?

BPJ: No, we're not pointing a finger at any one church, I said.
I think we're pointing a finger at all churches
|
The Spin Doctor Is Back -
September 2004 |

September 27, 2004 -
It's been awhile since we mentioned Bernice Powell Jackson's name in
this space, but she's given us plenty to work with this week.

Her weekly rant is titled
"Protecting
the secret ballot" and feigns concern that military personnel may
be disenfranchised because they may be given
the option of voting by fax and email.

The idea, as proposed, gives those serving in the
military the option of
using email or fax instead of mail to vote. However, no one is
disenfranchised or deprived of any rights since they still have the
traditional option of
sending in their vote by mail.

Since the premise of her conspiracy theory is
completely dismantled by some simple facts, you have to wonder why she
would want to limit the options
that military personnel have to vote.

Could it be that Jackson doesn't want the military to
have additional voting options?

How ironic is it that Jackson, who frequently mentions
the disenfranchisement of black voters, would actually want to block
additional options for military personnel to vote?

|
Clueless in Cleveland, Part II -
April 2004 |

Must be something in the water on the
North Coast this weekend. Bernice Powell Jackson opines about Rwanda
in her
weekly rant... but fails to mention that the
U.S. knew within 16 days that a genocide would be taking place.
She does claims that our inaction "signed
the death warrants for tens of thousands of Rwandans" (even though
it was more like hundreds of thousands).
She tops off her "witness" with this gem:
"Clearly, knowing when to intervene is a complex matter."

Maybe these things are complex in her
universe, but in the real world, when hundreds of thousands are being
threatened and terms like "genocide" are being used, it's probably a
good idea to intervene. It's not just Bernice Powell Jackson either -
the slaughter in Rwanda serves as a reminder that the UCC's
"Just Peace"
ideology is not only ineffective, it can be deadly.


|
Witness for Spin
- March 2004 |

Bernice Powell Jackson's never-ending
spin-doctoring continues again this week with her weekly rant titled
"More Pain, No Gain". She's made it clear that she doesn't support the
President - which is fine - everyone could probably identify policies
the President has enacted that they would disagree with and even offer
a prophetic voice of disagreement. The problem is that Jackson
recycles political rhetoric under the guise of prophetic witness
without citing sources for her information. This week is no different
and we have a full breakdown of this week's spin.

The crux of Jackson's spin is unemployment
- but she doesn't cite what the actual unemployment rate is and where
that rate ranks historically. Some facts Jackson doesn't offer in her
weekly spin:
-
According to the Labor Department,
unemployment is 5.6%. Since 1980, the average unemployment rate has
been 6.2%. 5.6% unemployment is nothing to cheer about, but it is well
below average and much lower than the 9% unemployment in Europe.
-
The Labor Department's household survey —
which counts the number of all Americans who are actually working —
now stands at 138.3 million, an all-time high. The previous peak came
way back in January 2001 at 137.8 million. Since the end of 2002, 1.8
million more people have gone back to work. Jackson doesn't cite a
source for her claim that 2 million people are out of work.
-
According to the Treasury Department,
withheld tax receipts in February rose to their highest year-over-year
gain since July 2001, which, according to economist Joseph LaVorgna,
represents "a statistically significant predictor of non-farm
payrolls."
Spin and political rhetoric have no place
in prophetic witness and in the 'Internet Age,' Jackson's ignorance is
not an excuse. When someone like Jackson has to resort to lying to
offer her witness, maybe it's time to spend less of the UCC's
dwindling budget on an ad campaign and instead invest in some computer
classes for national office staff.


|
When the
facts don't work, lie -
February 2004 |

If it were a TV show, it would be billed
as "Fear Factor" meets "True Lies". Unfortunately, it's more
dishonesty from Bernice Powell Jackson - a member of the
UCC Collegium. Her
weekly column, "Witness For Justice," has evolved into a fact-checking
nightmare.
This week's rant combines racism, Charles Pickering and the
Patriot Act to paint a scary picture that would frighten any
reasonable person. However, the article looks more like a Hollywood
script than factual commentary. For starters, she states:

| |
There’s been a lot of talk over the past two weeks about President
Bush’s interim appointee to the Federal bench, Charles Pickering
and his ties to the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission and to
segregationist groups in that state. It seems to me that one of
the most important goals of history, including African American
history, is to learn from our past mistakes so that we can avoid
them in the future. |

Scary, huh? What she doesn't tell you is
exactly what the connection is between Pickering and the "Mississippi
Sovereignty Commission" (the state-sponsored
group that was committed to fighting integration in Mississippi).
In 1972, as a State Senator
representing Jones County, Pickering made a single phone call
to a staffer at the commission to get information about a labor
dispute in Jones County. If the truth doesn't matter, then It's OK to
call this "his ties to the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission".
What's further troubling is that his actual record on civil rights is
not even mentioned. She won't tell you that Pickering testified in a
criminal trial against the imperial wizard of the Ku Klux Klan in 1967
and lost re-election as a result, she won't tell you that in 1976,
while serving as chairman of the state Republican Party, Mr. Pickering
hired its first black political staffer, she won't tell you that as a
judge he threw out a civil jury award because he thought the jury was
biased against an inter-racial couple and, she won't tell you that,
against incredible odds, Pickering, as a private lawyer, defended a
black man accused of robbing a white girl at knife point and won his
acquittal after two trials. She also won't tell you that one of
Pickering's biggest supporters is activist
James Charles Evers (brother of Medgar
Evers) who claimed in a
Wall Street
Journal Editorial:

| |
I have
been saddened and appalled to read many of the allegations that
have been put forth about Judge Charles Pickering, whose
nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was
the subject of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday.
These allegations are mostly made by groups with a Washington,
D.C., address and a political agenda, not by anyone with real
knowledge of Mr. Pickering's long and distinguished record on
civil rights. |

The assault of the truth doesn't stop
there - she then tries to link the Mississippi Sovereignty
Commission to the Patriot Act without offering a single example of
how the Patriot Act has been abusive.

Whether it's misrepresenting the health
care coverage for Wal-Mart employees, distorting census data about
black poverty or maligning Judge Pickering, Bernice Powell Jackson has
a consistent problem with accuracy. Like many people, she prefers
playing political games (communicating thought provoking themes and
agendas) without much thought as to the full accuracy of her comments.
While that might be acceptable behavior for a politician (who most
people are naturally skeptical of), it should be unacceptable for a
denominational leader who people rely on as an honest steward and
witness.

|
New Year,
New Spin - January 2004 |

The New Year has brought new spin from
Executive Minister Bernice Powell Jackson. Her
first
column of the new year comprises two resolutions: to register more
voters and to raise the issue of health care wherever she goes. Both
are good, legitimate issues... so it's baffling that she (again) finds
the need to lie about it. From this week's column:

| |
The fact that the nation’s largest employer, Wal-Mart, for
instance, does not pay the health insurance costs for most of its
employees means that we all pay for their health care costs. |

There are plenty of reasons to jump on Wal-mart,
but this issue isn't one of them. According to the
Wall Street Journal:

| |
At Wal-Mart Stores Inc., for instance,
new hourly workers must wait six months to sign up for benefits,
and part-timers -- those who work fewer than 34 hours a week --
can join the plan only after two years on the job.
About 10% of Wal-Mart's work force
doesn't have, or has opted not to take, insurance; about half
are on the Wal-Mart plan, and the remaining 40% have insurance
elsewhere. |

If it's health care she is worried about,
perhaps she should first look at our own denomination. As mentioned
last month on this website, the United Church of Christ has it's own
issues on health care.
Advocate Health Care of Illinois is affiliated with the UCC and
is under investigation by the Attorney General of the State of
Illinois regarding it's billing practices. According to the
Service Employees International Union's Hospital Accountability
Project: "Advocate is the leading price gouger of Chicago's
uninsured as it charges that group 139 percent more for the same
treatment than those with insurance coverage" and "The project
also claims Advocate is Cook County's leading predatory collector, as
it sues to recover uncollected bills at a rate three times more than
area hospitals."

The gripe on this site is not about the
issue of health care - it's about honest communication of the problem.
There are many components to the health care issue: rising malpractice
insurance costs, out-dated patent laws that keep drug prices high and
the exploitation of uninsured patients... and there's no reason
whatsoever to lie about the issue. It's also important to recognize
our own failings on the issue (especially when it concerns an
affiliated hospital). The problems at Advocate Health Care - and the
moral resolution of those problems - could be an effective witness to
the problem of rising health care costs.
| Spin about Black Poverty -
September 2003 |

A few months ago I found myself feeling the need to write about
honesty and how it is all too often seen as an outdated value which
can be dealt with by spin doctors and those who would trivialize its
meaning.
-Bernice
Powell Jackson, Executive Minister for Justice and Witness
Ministries, United Church of Christ... and top UCC Spin Doctor.

It's odd that Bernice Powell Jackson would start off her
September 15, 2003
Witness for
Justice column with this bit of wisdom... and then proceed
with a screed that truly trivializes the meaning of honesty. The
premise for the article is a
Children's
Defense Fund study on "the
number of Black children living in extreme poverty." The CDF study
attempts to link reforms in welfare to an increase in extreme poverty
of black children.

Jackson claims "that
although black child poverty figures had reached their lowest point in
2001... the number of black children living in 'extreme poverty,''...
was near a record high."
What gets glossed over in her analysis are some rather significant
facts.
The Heritage Foundation reviewed the same US census data as the
CDF, and discovered:
- For the 25 years prior to
welfare reform, the percentage of black children living in poverty
remained virtually unchanged.
- Since welfare reform, the
poverty rate among black children has dropped by one-fourth, falling
from 41.5 percent in 1995 to 30.0 percent in 2001.
- The black child poverty rate
is at its lowest point in U.S. history.
- Since welfare reform, over
1.2 million black children have been lifted out of poverty.
- Since welfare reform, six
black children have been made better off and lifted out of poverty
for every black child whose economic condition has worsened.
Does this change the
fact that more black children are in "extreme poverty" than before? Of
course not, but Bernice Powell Jackson's commentary is either disingenuous or terribly
incomplete. While not a perfect system, welfare reforms have made
incredible progress in reducing poverty among blacks. Enhancements to
these reforms should be made to reduce extreme poverty as well, but
that isn't what Jackson is saying.

Jackson asks in her column, "In the wealthiest nation in the world,
what has happened to the virtue of charity?" The answer would have
been obvious if she was really interested in the truth and had done
some simple research. But this isn't about the truth... it's about
politics and spin doctoring. |