Charity Navigator is
America's premier independent charity evaluator.
They help charitable givers make intelligent
giving decisions by providing in-depth,
objective ratings and analysis of the financial
health of America's largest charities. Use
Charity Navigator's simple searchable database
to find a charity you can trust and support.
The Christian Church
(Disciples of Christ) is in a state of profound
disarray.Disarray in belief,
ecclesiology, mission, and consequently self-confidence.The church doesn’t know how to talk about its
fundamental theological beliefs; its structure is
fracturing under the stress of changing needs and
resources; and mission is faltering after the demise of
one of our major mission arms, the National Benevolent
Association (NBA).And so when asked
“who we are, what we think and do, and why,” our
responses are often fairly weak, lacking a vigor of
clarity and purpose, passion and conviction.
Take the time and
read
the whole commentary and ask yourself - do we have leaders in
our denomination with the courage to speak these kinds of truths?
_______________
February 26,
2007
Joe
Irwin response to UCCtruths
UCCtruths.com has an
open invitation to UCC leaders
to submit their own commentary
which will be posted, unedited at the top of the site, at any time.
I appreciate Joe Irwin's response to the February 14
post (photos below provided by Joe Irwin):
Thanks for publicizing my
first trip to Cuba in 2003 (February 14). I have had
many people email me asking how they might learn more
about Cuba and the Cuban people. While your recent web
posting makes some good points -- perhaps, I was a bit
over-dramatic -- the Travelogue you mentioned does not
report a mission or religious trip to Cuba. It was an
educational "study seminar" (as it clearly states), one
which had been occurring annually for over 25 years.
Thus, the goal of that trip was to get to know the Cuban
people, their society, and their culture -- as well as
their religion.
While that trip did not pretend to be a religious or
mission trip, two years ago, the Bush administration
tightened regulations which virtually ended most
humanitarian, medical, educational and religious travel
to Cuba. Thus, today, even full-time religious and
mission trips to Cuba have been virtually stopped. As an
American and a Christian, that concerns me. And, I am
surprised that it does not concern even the most
conservative of American citizens.
In any event, I'm sure you join me in hoping for the day
when we can relate in a caring and Christian manner to
ALL our neighbors -- whether their government be
democratic or socialist -- whether they be Cuba or Red
China (who happens to have a "preferred nation trading
status" with the US government). Thank you and may God
bless you in your work.
The Conferences of the
United Church of Christ Insurance Board (UCCIB) annual
meeting, February 15, received reports from both its
chair and president identifying 2006 as a year of
positive transition for the provider of insurance,
liability and risk management services to Disciples and
UCC churches throughout the United States.
“Over the past year we have addressed financial issues,
member renewal retention and operational concerns,
making us stronger in all areas from a year ago,”
reported Cathy Green, CEO and president of UCCIB. “While
I am dismayed by the loss of participants, nevertheless,
our size remains quite viable and in fact compares quite
favorably to insurance services provided by other
denominational programs,” Green added.
As we mentioned back in August, UCCIB CEO Cathy
Green has been absolutely amazing. In her very short time with UCCIB,
she has been able to turn around the struggling organization and
regained confidence in the UCC's self insured system. Her effective
planning and regular communication deserves significant recognition.
_______________
February 24,
2007
Dorhauer Conspiracy Tour Restricted
From a Penn Southeast
Conference email received today:
John Dorhauer Seminar -
Thursday, March 8, 1:00-4 PM
In a previous eBULLETIN you received information about a
special seminar for clergy on Thursday, March 8 from
1:00 to 4 PM in the Church House. This seminar will
feature the Rev. John Dorhauer, Associate Conference
Minister of the Missouri-Mid South Conference. The
purpose of this seminar is to inform pastors, licensed
ministers, and commissioned ministers about the work of
some organizations related to political movements who
are seeking to undermine the mission and ministry of
mainline churches. This seminar is purposely
designed for pastors and these authorized ministers
only. Therefore it is important that those who intend
to participate register with Sue either at
610-489-2056 or email at
sue@psec.org. Advanced registration is necessary
so that the appropriate arrangements can be made at the
Church House.
Translation: Lay members and Dorhauer
critics not welcome. While John Dorhauer dispenses criticism pretty
easily on his web site, he apparently wants to hide from any
scrutiny around his phony conspiracy.
Your OCWM money at work.
_______________
February 24,
2007
Univision heavily fined for lack of children's programming - but is
it a justice issue?
The UCC Office of Communication is "celebrating" over an apparent
decision by the Federal Communication Commission to impose the
largest fine ever on Univision for failing to provide quality
educational programming.
From the New York Times:
The commission has
decided to impose the heavy fine — disclosed by Kevin J.
Martin, the chairman of the commission, in an interview
— as a tough rebuke to Univision for claiming to meet
its obligations to broadcast educational children’s
programs by showing the Latino soap opera “Complices al
Rescate” (“Friends to the Rescue”) and other so-called
telenovelas.
The penalty, part of a settlement that will allow the
company to proceed with a buyout deal, is nearly three
times the previous record fine of $9 million, imposed
against Qwest Communications for violating telephone
interconnection rules in 2004, and significantly more
than the largest indecency penalty, $3.5 million, levied
against Viacom that same year for remarks by Howard
Stern and other so-called shock jocks on the radio.
While there is
reasonable concern about educational programming on television, is
this really a justice issue?
The
Office of Communication, Inc.
(OC Inc. for short) is the media advocacy arm of the United Church
of Christ - a legacy of the UCC's fight in the civil rights era when
media options were limited to a few television and radio stations
where the programming didn't reflect the ethnic diversity of the
audience, primarily in the south. While the issue of children's
educational programming is suitable for the FCC to investigate, is
it really a justice issue on par with civil rights? According to
Rev. Robert Chase, the UCC’s communications director,
supporting children's educational programming is actually a mandated
by the Gospels:
“The United Church of Christ has a long history of
advocacy on behalf of children,” Chase said. “Media has
such a profound impact upon society, especially upon the
youngest and most vulnerable among us. It is, therefore,
consistent with the Gospel mandate to care for ‘the
least of these’ that our concern extends into the
broadcast arena.”
I'm just thankful I
didn't have a mouthful of coffee while reading that.
Chase has a knack for
twisting the most obscure communication issues into justice issues.
Back in 2003,
according to the Washington Post, the UCC's Office of
Communication was part of an unethical campaign to block WorldCom's
licenses it used for its long distance and Internet services. Bob
Chase and team were working with lobbyists who were paid by WorldCom
competitors to sink the company. The "grass roots" campaign fizzled
as it became obvious that the initiative was generated by WorldCom
competitors - with the help of the UCC.
_______________
February 24,
2007
The politicization of education
Jan Resseger is back
complaining about No Child Left Behind education act...
and she's just as enlightening as ever.
From UC News:
The
National Council of Churches will sponsor a national
conference March 9 in Arlington, Va., on "fixing" the No
Child Left Behind education act.
Although the event will include secular participants,
the involvement of the nation's largest ecumenical
religious organization signals a growing grassroots
concern about the 2002 law, which is scheduled for
reauthorization by Congress this year.
"It's a complex issue, and we want people to get a
handle on it so they can speak from their faith," said
Jan Resseger, the UCC's minister for public education
and chairwoman of the National Council of Churches'
Committee on Public Education and Literacy. "We hope
people will be well-prepared to speak to Congress."
~~~~
The NCC is among 105 organizations that have signed a
statement demanding changes in the federal education
law, including a call to decrease the testing burden on
states and to ease up on sanctions against struggling
schools and districts.
As I mentioned last
year, there may be sound and
faithful reasons to disagree with the No Child Left Behind Act, but Resseger
barely makes the case and leaves the strong impression that this is
more about politics than education.
''I
believe the reinterpretation of the existing religious laws
directly restricts my right as an American to practice my
religion,'' said Joe Irwin, spokesman for the United Church of
Christ's Southeast Pennsylvania Region. "I think it's
offensive, and actually quite scary to Americans that suddenly
their right to practice their religion is controlled by the
government.''
Could Irwin have been
just a little more dramatic? I don't have any idea what religion Joe
Irwin is pretending to be a part of, but it's not the United Church
of Christ since travel to Cuba for a vacation isn't one of the
tenants of our faith.
In the Travelogue,
Irwin
details all the beautiful places they went and even notes "In
Cuba, every block or neighborhood is organized around a CDR
(Committee for Defense of the Revolution.) These CDR groups work to
solve local problems," and "Several CDRs got together to throw a
huge block party for us. There was much hospitality with lots of
music, dancing, food, rum and friendly conversation."
To anyone with even the
slightest bit of knowledge about the governmental control structures
in Cuba, the CDR's were formed during the Cuban Missile Crisis to
keep the locals from speaking out against the revolution or taking
part in any uprisings against Castro. Today, the primary function of
the CDR is that of a local snitch.
TUCKER CARLSON: So Barack
Obama is a member of a church called Trinity United
Church of Christ. It‘s a predominantly black church in
Chicago, that espouses something called the black values
system, which includes calls for congregants to be
soldiers for black freedom and a, quote, disavowal of
the pursuit of middle classness. Now, it would seem to
me, Tom, not to make a broad sweeping statement here,
but a racially exclusive theology, a theology that
ministers to one group of people, based on race, kind of
contradicts the basic tenants of Christianity, and is
worth talking about. Wouldn‘t you say?
TOM ANDREWS: Well, let‘s look at what
those values actually are. We‘re talking about hard
work, self-reliance, belief in god, and if you have made
it to the middle class, you have an obligation to those
who have not. Now, those sound like pretty good values
to me, black, white or whatever, and I think that Barack
Obama should not be ashamed of having those values and
being part of a church.
TUCKER CARLSON: Again, those are great
values, that I hope I embody. However, it‘s the word
before them, black. It‘s making them racially
specific. Again, Christianity—this is a subject that I
am actually qualified to discuss—is, it seems to me,
almost explicitly anti-racial. The idea is that we are
all equal in the eyes of god. When you espouse a
theology that is racially exclusive, as this appears to
be, it‘s hard to call that Christianity. I think it‘s
pretty easy to call it wrong.
_______________
February 12,
2007
UPDATE:
Associated Press- "I think the
majority of voters know that I'm a member of the United Church of
Christ, and that I take my faith seriously," Obama said.
Barack Obama at
General Synod?
Sources inside the United Church of Christ have confirmed that
discussions have started about the possibility of Barack Obama at
least making an appearance ~and possibly giving a speech~ at the
United Church of Christ General Synod in Hartford, Connecticut at
the end of June.
"It makes sense on both
sides. The timing and platform is a good one for the Senator to make
it clear to the voting public that he is a Christian. It's also
great publicity for the UCC," according to the source.
Questions about
logistics and the mixing of church and state remain. At this point,
it is difficult for a Presidential contender to make a commitment
for a date in June. In addition, there are concerns that if an
appearance is not properly orchestrated, a conflict of church and
state could overshadow the event.
Americans United for the
Separation of Church and State is already investigating a deal
between the Governor of Connecticut, the UCC and the Hartford Civic
Center to keep the UCC General Synod in Connecticut. According to a report in the Hartford Courant
last year,
the state is "taking care of the $100,000 fee for the Civic Center"
for the UCC's General Synod. Rev. Barry Lynn, Executive Director of
American United and ordained UCC minister, made it clear in October
he was "concerned" about the arrangement. Lynn contrasted the deal
with a similar arrangement that the State of Maryland made to host a
Baptist convention in June of last year. In that deal, a $150,000
state grant was used to help defray the costs of transportation for
the group's convention in Baltimore.
Lynn called the grant
"totally inappropriate and clearly unconstitutional. Religious
groups should pass the collection plate to their own members, not
the taxpayers.”
In the UCC case, Lynn
said "There are a number of questions that need to be answered. Is
there a precedence in Connecticut of other religious groups
receiving similar grants or is the UCC an exception?"
While secular groups regularly receive grants from states to attract
convention business, Lynn made it clear that there is a distinction
between secular and religious groups being the beneficiary of these
types of grants.
_______________
February 9,
2007
"Steeplejacking":
The John Dorhauer
Conspiracy Tour
We've been entertained for months now by Missouri Mid-South
Associate Conference Minister
John Dorhauer's semi-regular postings on
Talk2Action.org about a
vast right wing conspiracy to bring down liberal churches.
Now, the John Dorhauer Conspiracy Show is going on tour - and
it could be visiting a city near you. From an email received today
from the Pennsylvania Southeast Conference:
Things You Need
to Know: How Church Stealers are at Work A special informative session
for all ordained, licensed, and commissioned ministers
will be held on Thursday, March 8, from 1:00 to 4:00
P.M. in the Church House, Collegeville. The presenter
will be the Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer, Associate
Conference Minister on the staff of the
Missouri Mid-South Conference.
In his time on Conference Staff, John has had many
opportunities to work closely with churches that have
come under attack by agents and activists intent on
pulling churches out of the denomination. John has
studied the tactics and tools used by these activists;
and along with his colleague on staff, the Rev. Sheldon
Culver, he has written extensively about their findings.
John contributes weekly to the website , wherein he
chronicles the inner workings of attacks leveled against
our congregations. He also has written for the magazine
'Zion's Herald,'and has appeared on Air America's "State
of Belief" with the Executive Director of the Interfaith
Alliance, Welton Gaddy.
He is awaiting the release of a book co-authored with
Sheldon Culver entitled Steeplejacking, due to be
released later this spring. John has partnered in his
research with investigative journalist Fred Clarkson,
author of the groundbreaking work "Eternal Hostility:
the Struggle between Theocracy and Democracy," and the
clinical psychologist Andrew Weaver, with whom he has
co-authored a number of articles on the subject and who
himself contributed to another seminal work, "Hardball
on Holy Ground." John has traveled the breadth of the
country informing denominational and congregational
leaders about the efforts of renewal groups some of
which are aligned with ultra-right-wing political
organizations to dismantle and destabilize Mainline
Protestant denominations.
During the Church House seminar John will provide
pastors with practical tools to help identify and deal
with influences seeking to destabilize and even to
withdraw congregations from the United Church of Christ.
If you decide to go to
the event, don't expect any real evidence of a conspiracy. A
thorough reading of
his own
articles about the conspiracy didn't yield any proof and Dorhauer refused to offer any evidence when challenged by
UCCtruths.com and by visitors to his web site.
_______________
February 9,
2007
Evolution Sunday?
UC News has an interesting article today promoting "Evolution
Sunday". When I first read the article, I was encouraged that
finally some rational discussion on the complimentary nature between
evolution and religion was taking place. I firmly believe the two
are compatible and are not mutually exclusive. For instance, I don't
believe a day to God is necessarily the same as it is for us mortals
living on a rock that fully rotates in 24 hours. Such thinking
places man on earth, not God, as the center of the universe - much
like those who believed the earth was flat. We can't define what the
length of a day is to God and it's this fact that opens up the
possibility that the evolutionary process is God's plan that is
articulated in Genesis.
The article, however, is not quite so specific on the details of
how evolution and religion are compatible:
The Rev. Bill Hirschfeld,
a UCC minister with a Ph.D. in biology, will observe
“Evolution Sunday” on Feb. 11 at First Congregational
UCC in Cadillac, Mich. He’ll make his case that
Christianity and science are friends, not enemies.
“You don’t have to make a choice between being a
Christian and believing in evolution,” Hirschfeld told
the Cadillac News.
The Second Annual Evolution Sunday, sponsored by The
Clergy Letter Project, was created so that congregations
could “join together to discuss the compatibility of
religion and science.”
Contrary to the article,
the "Clergy Letter Campaign" does distinguish religion from
science and ultimately pits the two against each other:
Many
of the beloved stories found in the Bible – the
Creation, Adam and Eve, Noah and the ark – convey
timeless truths about God, human beings, and the proper
relationship between Creator and creation expressed in
the only form capable of transmitting these truths from
generation to generation. Religious truth is of a
different order from scientific truth. Its purpose
is not to convey scientific information but to transform
hearts.
The letter does not
convey any compatibility at all and it suggests that the motivation
for this letter writing campaign is more political than theological.
Either you believe God is our creator (even through the evolution
process) or you do not.
Besides that, I'll leave
the politics to the politicians.
_______________
February 7, 2007
More Dorhauer, More Nonsense
Without any fuel
left in his conspiracy engine,
Associate
Missouri Mid-South Associate
Conference Minister John Dorhauer has decided, again, to turn his
dishonesty on this humble web site.
From his latest post on Talk2Action.org:
Often, when I talk about
the former, I refer to conspiratorial tactics. And when
I do, I am asked why I don't allude to conspiracies when
churches vote to leave their own denomination to join
us.
Though I find the
question disingenuous (because those who ask it know the
answer, and use the question as a clever tool to delude
others who are less informed about the internal dynamics
involved in these matters), I will respond to it here.
On the
www.ucctruths.org (a name which, like the Institute on
Religion and Democracy, suggests something to the
uninformed other than what it actually is) website, the
question is posed in this way:
When the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas
decided to leave their denomination (the Metropolitan
Community Churches) for the UCC, did we consider that
a conspiracy?
To answer as directly as possible: no.
`We' (those of us in the United Church of Christ who
write and talk about conspiracy tactics leveled against
our churches to remove them from the denomination) do
not consider that a conspiracy.
Dorhauer's attention to detail seems
only to be matched by his attention span and apparent inability to
read more than one sentence at a time. For starters, this web site
is UCCtruths.COM, not .ORG. Since Dorhauer doesn't give his readers
the benefit of actually seeing what was posted on this site with a
link, here is the whole
paragraph of what was posted:
When the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas
decided to leave their denomination (the Metropolitan Community
Churches) for the UCC, did we consider that a conspiracy? Some
peripheral facts might lead you to think as much - after all, they
began conversation with the UCC at least 18 months before joining,
they were headed by a UCC minister and they were embroiled in their
own internal, divisive politics. In the end, we respect Cathedral of
Hope's decision because we respect a local church's ability to
discern for itself what is best for it's members. It wasn't a
conspiracy. Whether we like it or not, our polity gives local
churches this freedom to make these decisions.
When you actually
read the whole post, you get an entirely different picture than
the conspiracy Dorhauer cooks up in his post. Plainly speaking, John
Dorhauer dishonestly represented what was directly stated on this
web site - which is why he doesn't provide a link to this web site.
It's also why I suspect Dorhauer doesn't give his readers the
benefit of any tangible proof of a
church stealing conspiracy - he either doesn't have any proof or
he's afraid that if his readers actually saw the evidence, they
wouldn't believe him either.
All of this nonsense
from a guy whose salary is paid for by your OCWM dollars.