Charity Navigator is America's premier independent charity evaluator. They help charitable givers make intelligent giving decisions by providing in-depth, objective ratings and analysis of the financial health of America's largest charities. Use Charity Navigator's simple searchable database to find a charity you can trust and support.

 

July 30, 2006

CT union boycott suspended,

John Thomas embarrassed... again

According to the Hartford Courant, the union boycott of the Connecticut Convention Center, which caused the UCC to relocate the 2007 General Synod, has now been suspended as part of a "cooling off period". Apparently, the UCC was the only major group to react to the boycott. From the Hartford Courant:

The one major convention that relocated out of the convention center and hotel - the 2007 national convention of the United Church of Christ - took advantage of a state-funded bailout to move its events to the nearby Civic Center and keep its event in Hartford.

At the time the UCC announced it was supporting the boycott, UCC President John Thomas claimed that "the UCC has stood with farm workers in California and with workers in Ohio and Michigan and other parts of the country. Now it is time to stand with convention workers and hotel workers in Hartford." Connecticut Conference Minister Davida Foy Crabtree added that "there is a water theme going on here. We are standing here in the rain, we are standing here by the river and I am remembering a scripture that says let justice roll down like water and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream."

Apparently, Thomas and Crabtree weren't talking to workers at the Connecticut Convention Center. Also from the Hartford Courant:

Pete Pusztai, an engineer at the convention center, arrived at the city hall steps Friday just as the unions were wrapping up their press conference on the boycott.

"You're basically strangling our income," Pusztai told union organizers, adding that no one he knows has asked to unionize. "Why would we want to join a union that wants to choke us into submission to let you in? You're not the union I want."

Pusztai complained about the negative effect of the boycott on workers. Dugdale said that he should be happy that now is the time for "cooling off."

"The thing is," Pusztai said, "we were never hot."

This is nothing short of another major embarrassment for the UCC national office and Connecticut Conference Minister, Davida Foy Crabtree. Not only is the UCC sapping Connecticut taxpayers of $100,000 to relocate our General Synod in a constitutionally questionable deal, there was no real "justice" issue and the national office's support of the boycott only hurt the workers they were pretending to support.

Crabtree was right about one thing: "there is a water theme going on here".... and she is all wet.

_______________ 

July 28, 2006

Conference Ministers respond to 'Faithful and Welcoming Churches'

Conference Ministers are circulating a new document titled "Faithful and Welcoming Churches: A Position Statement". The paper was written by Rev. Gene Kraus, Interim Conference Minister of the Illinois South Conference and has been endorsed by the Council of Conference Ministers of the United Church of Christ. The paper is surprisingly proactive. The paper identifies three areas of agreement and five areas of disagreement. While there are some key points that we're sure FWC will disagree with, there is a least a starting point for some positive dialog ~ which is surprising considering how negative conference ministers have been with any dissent within the UCC. It's 17 pages and definitely worth reading.

_______________ 

July 28, 2006

Thomas changes tune on Middle East conflict... sort of

UCC President John Thomas, with Cally Rogers-Witte. Executive Minister of
Wider Church Ministries, issued a new statement on the Middle East conflict. From the statement
:

We are witnesses to a Middle East weary for peace yet enflamed once again in violence. We mourn the death of all those killed in Lebanon, Israel and Gaza, and despair for the lives and land indelibly scarred by the violence. All sides must stop the killing and devastation. The United States and international community must work diplomatically and urgently to reach a cease-fire between Hezbollah and Israel, and Hamas and Israel, and to pursue negotiations toward a sustainable peace in the Arab-Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All nations should resist exploiting the current conflict to further political or ideological aims in the region. Neither security, hegemony, nor democracy can be achieved by continuing and widening the violence.

At least with this statement, it's clear that Thomas is beginning to learn that if he is going to open his mouth on this issue, he needs to address the multiple dimensions and not exclusively attack the actions of Israel... but he still has work to do. If nothing else, he get's points for not taking another cheap shot at Jewish groups. While he is full condemnation for nearly everyone involved, he's careful not to say anything negative about Hamas. Intentional or not, Thomas's words really don't mean anything anymore. He long ago lost any credibility on this issue and he really isn't contributing any intellectual or spiritual capital - who cares what Thomas thinks about the Middle East?

Yes, besides this site.

Seriously - who is this really directed to? UCC members? Congress? Our 'friends' in the Middle East?

_______________ 

July 20, 2006

The Wiesenthal Center Responds to John Thomas

The Simon Wiesenthal Center has responded to UCC President John Thomas's "Pastoral Letter" to Palestinians. Below is a copy of both letters:

A Pastoral Letter to Palestinian Friends and Partners from UCC President John Thomas

Dear Sisters and Brothers in Christ:

As I write this letter, dear friends, the military and humanitarian crisis intensifies around you. We watch with horror and outrage as Israel punishes an entire population for the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier in Gaza, and as belligerence escalates with Hizb Allah’s attack on military personnel near Lebanon. While we pray for the Israeli soldiers’ release and safe return to family, we also know that these incidents have become an occasion for the further oppression of the Palestinian community, for the massive destruction of economic infrastructure and for the tragic loss of much innocent life. Meanwhile, the separation barrier continues to restrict travel, even for the purpose of meeting desperate human need, and sanctions against the Palestinian Authority have caused a financial strangulation of vital political, educational and humanitarian institutions. The complicity of our own government in these sanctions is cause for particular grief.

Making this situation even more burdensome is the recognition that there are many in the United States, including many Christians, who see only Israel’s need for security, who focus only on a few terrorist acts which you yourselves condemn. In doing so, they largely ignore the systemic oppression of an entire people in what increasingly amounts to a virtual prison in which almost every aspect of Palestinian life is controlled by Israel. Many in our own churches are subject to intense lobbying by Jewish groups demonizing the Palestinian community in general, and many of you in particular. Even some of our denominational gatherings of ecumenical partners here in the United States sound what may seem to you to be an uncertain voice.

In the face of such suffering and the temptation for despair, I write to assure you of the prayers and solidarity of the United Church of Christ. I am grateful that this is being signified personally by Peter Makari’s presence in the region this summer, accompanied by several of my colleagues. Know that we continue to be guided by our commitment to peace with justice, to negotiations leading toward a future in which Israel and Palestine mutually co-exist within secure and internationally recognized borders, to a shared Jerusalem, and to full protection and access to holy sites. In addition, we remain steadfast in our denunciation of Israel’s separation barrier, articulated in last summer’s General Synod resolution, and in our readiness to use our church’s economic resources, including the possibility of divestment, to press for an end to the Occupation and to support peacemaking and the Palestinian community. Finally, we will not remain silent in the face of our own government’s policies which continue to reward Israel while failing to press in significant ways for the “road map” it has proposed.

Centuries ago, in the midst of equally urgent times, our Reformed forebears asked, “What is your only comfort in life and in death?” They answered, “that we belong, body and soul, in life and in death, not to ourselves but to our faithful savior Jesus Christ.” May this comfort sustain you, and may the knowledge that we belong together in bonds of mutual affection and shared commitment be encouraging in these desperately challenging days.

In Christ,

John H. Thomas
General Minister and President
United Church of Christ (USA)

 

Response to UCC President John Thomas from The Simon Wiesenthal Center

Dear President Thomas,

We appreciate the clarity of your “Pastoral Letter to Palestinian Friends and Partners.” You have made the sides abundantly clear. On one side are Israel, the United States, the G8, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. All of these faulted the unprovoked murderous cross-border attacks and kidnappings by Hezbollah that have led to suffering of the citizens of both Israel and Lebanon. On the other side are Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, Syria, the UCC and John Thomas, who see things differently. We also understand why your remarks during this week of death and misery address only the suffering of your Palestinian friends. History teaches that silence is admittance and your silence over innocent Jewish victims speaks volumes.

We would have thought that your hostility against the Jewish state in the past would have been tempered by developments of the past year, even before the Hezbollah attacks. Israel’s painful dismantling of her Gaza communities; the Palestinian response in directing hundreds of Kassams into civilian populations within Israel’s internationally recognized pre-1967 borders, and then electing a Hamas government; the rabid hatemongering of Iran’s Ahmadinejad (which you yourself noted and reacted against) - any of these might have provided you with an opportunity to add some new words in your lexicon, like balance and responsibility. Instead, you piously advise Israel to lay bare her Jewish, Christian and Moslem citizens to continuous murderous attacks by demanding the removal of the anti-terrorism separation barrier without ever even offering a suggestion of an alternative. You mourn the degradation of Palestinian buildings, but ignore the deliberate targeting of civilians in Israel, including the two Israeli Arab children killed this week by a Hezbollah rocket. You have nothing to say about the hundreds upon hundreds of Kassams and Katyushas that continue to rain down upon Israel’s cities and towns, in the latest attempt to eradicate the Jewish State.

Why now? Perhaps you provide cover for Hezbollah in order to justify your previous behavior. Not too many Americans have had the opportunity of face to face meetings with Hezbollah, but when you first encountered them, as you wrote in your travel diary in 2003, you did so with an attitude of bemusement that they were in the audience. Most Americans, we think, would have bolted in distaste from those who killed hundreds of Marines in Beirut. Has Che Guevara replaced G-d in your theology, so that no "underdog" can ever be called evil, no matter what his actions or moral platform? And why have you abandoned your Christian coreligionists in Lebanon! Can you not see what even Arab heads of state and a UN resolution have noted: that the people of Lebanon are being used as human sandbags by Hezbollah and their masters in Syria and Iran?

At least you are honest. You used to rail about the pressure from the “pro-Israel lobby.” You’ve dropped the code language. It’s Jews you’re talking about, as you admit in your current letter. Your irritation is puzzling, though. You have done a near perfect job keeping those pesky Jews from your offices, and from your convention floor when resolutions about the fate of Israelis came up. If we didn’t know better, we would think you simply don’t like outside interference and pressure. But you have no problem with the pressure from organizations like Sabeel and Al-Awda, both of whom reject the legitimacy of a Jewish state, and both of whom have either partnered with the UCC, or have been listed as a resource. And you don’t mind twisting a few arms yourself, do you? Remember the infamous “midnight meeting” at your General Synod in 2005, when you didn’t like the committee recommendation to the floor, so you substituted your own language, without anyone realizing it and had delegates adopt a resolution different from what they thought they were approving?

Most confusing, perhaps, is what your bias and hostility have to do with Christianity and Christian love. Mercifully, you are not the only Christian role model around. We hope that Jews and Christians alike will not confuse your convoluted thinking with the genuine regard and concern we have seen in other circles, ranging from the Evangelical Right to our very good friends in the Reformed traditions, such as those who successfully led the battle at the recent Presbyterian General Assembly to rewrite policies on divestment and the security fence that were unfair and unbalanced.

In Israel, united in its determination to end the scourge of missiles in the hands of terrorists, people nonetheless stop to read, think, and debate about the calamitous effects of war on people on the other side of the border, particularly civilians. In the midst of their trying circumstances, with two million Israelis in the north hunkering down in shelters, they find room to commiserate with others. Here in America, leaders of other church groups, including those who differ politically with Israel’s decisions, responded to the losses of both Israelis and Lebanese. We strongly suspect that peace will only become possible when both sides at least acknowledge the pain and suffering of the other, even as they pursue their separate agendas. Failure to evidence that mutuality of pain was a missed opportunity for you to teach others what undoubtedly is in the hearts of many of the rank and file of the UCC.

We hope and pray that the good will and good sense that serves as the basis for Christian-Jewish relations in America will continue to prevail, and that one day you too may know the blessings of its spirit.

Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein
Director, Interfaith Affairs

Rabbi Abraham Cooper
Associate Dean

-The Simon Wiesenthal Center

_______________ 

July 20, 2006

Davida Foy Crabtree defends UCC advocacy

The recent dustup over a Congressional candidate's affiliation with the UCC has spawned new discussion about the UCC's advocacy on Middle-East issues. It is interesting to see how defensive UCC leaders, like Connecticut Conference Minister Davida Foy Crabtree, have gotten now that the media is asking questions about the UCC's position. In response, the Connecticut Conference has published an article addressing these issues by highlighting a statement from Crabtree:

Connecticut Conference Minister Davida Foy Crabtree said, in a statement, "The Middle East is fraught with complexity, never more so than now. The United Church of Christ stands united against all forms of terrorism and it has certainly never 'justified suicide bombings.' We affirm our Middle East partners' clear opposition to violence and suicide bombings."

In reality, the 2005 resolutions specifically condemn terrorism and violence on the part of all parties to the Middle East conflict. The resolution Concerning Use of Economic Leverage for Promoting Peace in the Middle East does not name any particular group as a target for economic action. Instead, it calls upon UCC bodies to support demilitarization of the region, to support peacemaking organizations, and to work to change the behavior of organizations that profit from the perpetuation of violence.

Crabtree is right - Israel was not specifically targeted in the "Economic Leverage" resolution but her comment is extremely disingenuous since, in reality, you can only divest assets from publicly traded companies. Since there is no way to divest from Hamas terrorists making homemade bombs, effectively the UCC's resolution only targets companies doing business with Israel. This is best demonstrated by UCC President John Thomas's own words this week when he said "we remain steadfast in our denunciation of Israel’s separation barrier, articulated in last summer’s General Synod resolution, and in our readiness to use our church’s economic resources, including the possibility of divestment, to press for an end to the Occupation and to support peacemaking and the Palestinian community."

Jewish groups weren't fooled either when the resolutions were approved. The Anti-Defamation League called the UCC leadership's aggressive stand against Israel "deeply troubling" and the Simon Wiesenthal Center called the UCC's anti-Israel resolutions "functionally anti-Semitic"

Crabtree isn't fooling anyone... except maybe herself.

_______________ 

July 19, 2006

UPDATE: Solomonia chimes in: "It's quite amazing that even now, with bombs exploding in Israel and open war with Hizballah and Hamas, Thomas is still obsessing over the security fence. Yikes."

UPDATE: One of the "few terrorist acts" kills two children in Nazareth

UCC President John Thomas hits new low

The tenure of John Thomas as President of the United Church of Christ hit a new low this week with the publication of a "Pastoral Letter to Palestinian Friends and Partners" in response to the escalation of violence in the Middle-East. The letter, laced with strong anti-Israel rhetoric, included a direct threat to divest church assets from companies that do business in Israel. From the "Pastoral Letter":

Dear Sisters and Brothers in Christ:

As I write this letter, dear friends, the military and humanitarian crisis intensifies around you. We watch with horror and outrage as Israel punishes an entire population for the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier in Gaza, and as belligerence escalates with Hizb Allah’s attack on military personnel near Lebanon. While we pray for the Israeli soldiers’ release and safe return to family, we also know that these incidents have become an occasion for the further oppression of the Palestinian community, for the massive destruction of economic infrastructure and for the tragic loss of much innocent life. Meanwhile, the separation barrier continues to restrict travel, even for the purpose of meeting desperate human need, and sanctions against the Palestinian Authority have caused a financial strangulation of vital political, educational and humanitarian institutions. The complicity of our own government in these sanctions is cause for particular grief.

Making this situation even more burdensome is the recognition that there are many in the United States, including many Christians, who see only Israel’s need for security, who focus only on a few terrorist acts which you yourselves condemn. In doing so, they largely ignore the systemic oppression of an entire people in what increasingly amounts to a virtual prison in which almost every aspect of Palestinian life is controlled by Israel. Many in our own churches are subject to intense lobbying by Jewish groups demonizing the Palestinian community in general, and many of you in particular. Even some of our denominational gatherings of ecumenical partners here in the United States sound what may seem to you to be an uncertain voice.

In the face of such suffering and the temptation for despair, I write to assure you of the prayers and solidarity of the United Church of Christ. I am grateful that this is being signified personally by Peter Makari’s presence in the region this summer, accompanied by several of my colleagues. Know that we continue to be guided by our commitment to peace with justice, to negotiations leading toward a future in which Israel and Palestine mutually co-exist within secure and internationally recognized borders, to a shared Jerusalem, and to full protection and access to holy sites. In addition, we remain steadfast in our denunciation of Israel’s separation barrier, articulated in last summer’s General Synod resolution, and in our readiness to use our church’s economic resources, including the possibility of divestment, to press for an end to the Occupation and to support peacemaking and the Palestinian community. Finally, we will not remain silent in the face of our own government’s policies which continue to reward Israel while failing to press in significant ways for the “road map” it has proposed.

Centuries ago, in the midst of equally urgent times, our Reformed forebears asked, “What is your only comfort in life and in death?” They answered, “that we belong, body and soul, in life and in death, not to ourselves but to our faithful savior Jesus Christ.” May this comfort sustain you, and may the knowledge that we belong together in bonds of mutual affection and shared commitment be encouraging in these desperately challenging days.

In Christ,

John H. Thomas
General Minister and President
United Church of Christ (USA)

Thomas's letter is closer to something we would expect to see from Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad than a Christian leader and only serves to not just isolate himself and the UCC from the Jewish community, but from the broader mainline Christian community that clearly does not share his extreme views.

It's hard to imagine how much hate was going through John Thomas's heart when he wrote this 'pastoral letter'. What Thomas called "a few terrorist acts" include 800 rocket attacks targeting Israel that "were at best indiscriminate attacks in civilian areas and at worst the deliberate targeting of civilians" according to Human Rights Watch. Thomas's characterization that Jewish groups have lobbied churches to demonize Palestinians "in general" is plainly false. Widely respected Jewish groups, such as the Anti-Defamation League and the Wiesenthal Center, merely challenged the UCC's General Synod anti-Israel resolutions and questioned our denomination's strong affiliation with Sabeel which has "openly questioned Israel's right to exist".

And... for what it's worth... Thomas's threat of divestment is empty. He has no control of any UCC investments and the UCC Pension Boards made it clear to Thomas after he pushed divestment at the last General Synod that they will "adhere to a strict interpretation of our fiduciary responsibility".

It is sincerely sad to see the leader of our denomination implode in such an irrational and public way. We can only feel sorry for him.

_______________ 

July 18, 2006

Details of CT deal for General Synod emerge

Details of the deal that moved the UCC's General Synod from the Connecticut Convention Center to the Hartford Civic Center have emerged. From the Waterbury Connecticut Republican American newspaper:

Gov. M. Jodi Rell "made it clear that we did not want to lose the event," said Judd Everhart, a spokesman for Rell. "This was a huge convention that the governor wanted to make sure stayed in Hartford."

The subsidy will come from the state's quasi-public Capital City Economic Development Authority, or CCEDA, which owns the convention center, and from the Greater Hartford Convention & Visitors Bureau. The subsidy is "larger than usual," said Michael Cicchetti, CCEDA assistant director, but not entirely unheard of as cities vie to host conventions that have a large economic impact.

"This was a unique circumstance and you cannot look at it in a vacuum," he said. "There will be a huge benefit to Hartford as attendees stay in hotels, eat at restaurants and spend their money in the city."

Very often, he said, organizers pay for local transportation costs or the cost of an opening banquet to woo conventioneers.

In the UCC case, he said, it is necessary to look at the "totality of the circumstance" and a host of other factors that ensure Connecticut does not become a loser in the convention game.

"We cannot eat any cost and we have to keep in mind our business," said Laura Brubaker, a spokeswoman for Madison Square Garden, which runs the civic center, adding that no additional fee is being charged. In a statement, MSG said it was pleased it was able to accommodate the UCC meeting.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State is investigating the deal between the Governor of Connecticut, the UCC and the Hartford Civic Center to keep the UCC General Synod in Connecticut.

_______________ 

July 17, 2006

EXCLUSIVE - MUST CREDIT UCCTRUTHS.COM

CT Congressional candidate in another UCC-related controversy

Thursday, July 18 PM Update... First Church of Hartland UCC pastor says that the Hartland Boulevard address used for MacLean's filing is his residence

In another twist to the congressional "campaign-turned-soap opera" in Connecticut's 1st district, new questions have arisen about candidate Scott MacLean's ties to the United Church of Christ. According to public notices published in the Hartford Courant and other Connecticut newspapers, the address MacLean used to file his candidacy (3 Hartland Boulevard, East Hartland, CT 06027) matches public records for a tax-exempt property owned by First Church of Hartland UCC. MacLean is a retired, ordained UCC minister and is currently the early morning Newscast Director at WFSB-TV, Channel 3 in Hartford.

Emails to MacLean and to First Church of Hartland UCC for comment were not returned as of late this afternoon.

Last month, UCCtruths.com first reported that MacLean had invited supporters to a campaign meeting at First Church of Hartland UCC's Parish Hall which is located at 5 Hartland Boulevard ~ across the street from the church. Public records from 2004 (the only year for available information on the property) indicate that the 3 Hartland Boulevard property that MacLean used to file for candidacy is also owned by the church and is tax exempt for religious purposes.

While Connecticut voters and the state will have to sort out MacLean's residency status, First Church of Hartland UCC may have violated it's tax exempt status if it knowingly participated in MacLean's campaign. According to the United Church of Christ's "Guidelines for Congregations and Clergy on Political Action", almost all churches are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3)

IRS Warns Churches to Avoid Campaigning

7/18/2006 LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The Internal Revenue Service has been warning churches and nonprofit organizations that improper campaigning in the upcoming political season could endanger their tax-exempt status.

In notices to more than 15,000 tax-exempt organizations, numerous church denominations and tax preparers, the agency has detailed its new enforcement program, called the Political Activity Compliance Initiative, the Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.
Full article...

of the Internal Revenue Code on the basis that they are “operated exclusively for religious, charitable or educational purposes." A 501 (c)(3) exempt organization may not “participate in, or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office.” In his original meeting invitation, MacLean claimed that "the good folks from the First Church in Hartland-Congregational (my home church) have graciously let me use the Parish Hall for campaign meetings." MacLean has since claimed that no meeting took place although he reserves the right to hold meetings there in the future.

As reported last month, the MacLean controversy comes on the heels of a controversy in Ohio where two megachurches are being accused of illegal political activities for their support of Republican candidate for Governor, Ken Blackwell. A group of Columbus clergy, headed by UCC minister Eric Williams, has filed a complaint with the IRS questioning the tax-exempt status of the churches. The complaint alleges that the megachurches have used their churches for partisan politics.

_______________ 

July 17, 2006

UCC / Congressional candidate links makes national news

The heated congressional campaign in Connecticut's 1st District continues to make news and the link between MacLean and the United Church of Christ seems to be the primary focus. From the Associated Press:

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) _ Religion and the Israel-Palestinian conflict have become sharp issues in the primary campaign among Republicans who are seeking to challenge Democratic Rep. John Larson in November.

Miriam Masullo has linked rival Scott MacLean, a retired minister in the United Church of Christ, to church leaders who she said support terrorists and suicide bombings. She made her comments in a recent letter to Republican leaders in the 1st Congressional District.

Masullo said MacLean has not disavowed the church leadership, which she said has a political agenda that contrasts with Republican principles.

"I don't like it and I think the voters should know about it," she said. "If the church is asking Israel to take down barriers and not asking Palestinians to stop their attacks, then we have a problem here."

MacLean said Masullo's comments were preposterous and do not fairly represent the policy positions of church President John Thomas and other clergy who support Palestinian refugees and have spoken on other Mideast issues.

"Politically liberal, moderate and conservative members are all welcomed in our diverse collection of local churches and people are free to follow their faith without sacrificing their personal conscience," MacLean said.

While Masullo's words are strong and sharp, MacLean is foolishly wasting time defending UCC leaders - our denomination's leaders do not have a clean record on issues that relate to the Middle-East, Israel and domestic terrorism. Whether the issue is the UCC leadership's support of divestment from Israel, support for the removal of Israel's protective wall, criticism of the U.S. position on Iran's nuclear development (which turned out to be real), UCC President John Thomas's claim that the Axis of Evil “runs the length and breadth of Pennsylvania Avenue" or UCC leaders defense of Puerto Rican terrorists (FALN) in testimony to Congress (with literally no regard or communication with bombing victims) - our denominational leaders response on issues important to all voters should raise public concern. MacLean dodged addressing his position on these important issues and instead quipped "while I don't agree with everything that comes out of the national setting of the UCC, I don't agree with everything my wife says either, and I have no intention of divorcing either one". Whether MacLean likes it or not, he made his religious affiliation an issue when he invited campaign supporters to meet at a local UCC church (and reserves the right to do so in the future). No one is asking MacLean to divorce our church, but the voters of Connecticut's first district who are concerned about the Middle-East, Israel and domestic terrorism deserve to understand the positions of all candidates.

_______________ 

July 13, 2006

UCC becomes subject of political campaign in Connecticut

According to United Church News, The UCC itself has become the subject of a heated congressional campaign in Connecticut. From UC News:

The UCC has become the subject of political jabs in Connecticut, where Miriam Masullo, a Republican congressional primary candidate, issued a five-page letter on July 5 criticizing the UCC as “leftist and anti-Republican.” Her opponent for the Republican nomination is the Rev. Scott MacLean, an ordained UCC minister who has won the endorsement of the Republican Party establishment.


MacLean and Masullo are both seeking the Republican nod to challenge incumbent First District Congressman John B. Larson, a Democrat. The primary will be held on Aug. 8.

"The political arm of the UCC is actively waging a fight against Republican values and principles through a well-organized quest to undermine the support that Republican candidates get from what we think of as the Christian Right," wrote Masullo in an "open letter to the first district Republican leadership."

Masullo accused the UCC of attacking Ohio Republican Gubernatorial candidate Kenneth Blackwell, of promoting "economic sanctions against an ally of the United States in the war on terror," and of espousing "immoral justification of suicide bombings."

Masullo went on to criticize MacLean, a member of First Congregational UCC in Hartland, Conn., for using the church building for his political campaign meetings.

"[MacLean] has made no attempt to disavow himself from the political agenda of the UCC," Masullo wrote.

In response, MacLean said on July 11 that Masullo was "impugning the integrity of my church."

"UCC churches grace the centers of most New England towns because our Pilgrim and Puritan ancestors were the original English settlers in Connecticut and our First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and freedom of speech sprang from the noble efforts of these UCC forebears," MacLean said in a press release. "Politically liberal, moderate and conservative members, from all walks of life, are all welcome in our diverse collection of local churches and people are free to follow their faith without sacrificing their personal conscience."

"While I don’t agree with everything that comes out of the national setting of the UCC, I don’t agree with everything my wife says either and I have no intention of divorcing either one," MacLean continued.

"Like a good marriage, local UCC congregations work through the tough issues of our day with complete transparency and a dignity of process, respecting all points of view," he said. "With a 400-year tradition of local church autonomy enshrined as the working principle of our denomination, the national setting of the church does not speak 'for the church' but rather, 'to the church,' and each local congregation is free to do with that input as they wish."

Actually, it was UCCtruths.com which first raised the issue of MacLean's invitation to use of the church to hold campaign meetings. In an email received by UCCturths.com last evening from MacLean, he conceded that he sent the email as an invitation to meet at the church but denies that a meeting was ever held. From MacLean's email:

This meeting was supposed to be held last fall but no meeting took place and there have not been any campaign meetings at the parish hall. However, it is perfectly legal to do so if I choose to hold them there. The Federal Election Commission rules state, "The term 'contribution' does NOT include... the use of real property, including a church or community room used on a regular basis by members of the community for non commercial purposes..."  (Federal Election Campaign Laws, compiled by the Federal Election Commission, September, 2004, page 2, Paragraph 8-B-ii) 

MacClean also stated that the invitation was forwarded to UCCtruths to "serve my opponents highly partisan political purposes".

In response, I replied that "the purpose of posting the content of the email was in no way associated with partisanship and was clearly posted in context to the church/state issues raised by other UCC ministers in the Ohio governors race and the Governor of Connecticut's apparent financial support of the UCC's next General Synod in Hartford - both of which were reported on UCCtruths.com site some time ago."

There are some real issues here and holding a campaign meeting at a church raises legitimate questions about the separation of church and state. Granted, MacLean claims he never held a campaign meeting at his church - but he still insists that it's his right to do so. While MacLean makes reference to federal election laws on campaign contributions, the issue raised by UCCtruths.com has nothing to do with campaign finance laws, it's about the separation of church and state.

_______________ 

July 12, 2006

WCC and NCC critical of government decision on Cuban Council of Churches

United Church News is reporting on the dismay of the World Council of Churches that the U.S. government is planning to restrict the type of aid that can be funneled through the Cuban Council of Churches. From UC News:

"We strongly feel that it is completely inappropriate for the U.S. Government, or any government, to determine who is and who is not a legitimate national council of churches, and to restrict or deny Christian fellowship and humanitarian assistance to any particular national church council, including the Cuban Council of Churches," said [World Council of Churches general secretary, Rev. Samuel] Kobia.

The National Council of Churches has also chimed in on the controversy. From the NCC:

"We have had an ecumenical relationship with the Cuban Council of Churches for a long time, as have churches and councils of churches around the world," said Dr. Antonios Kireopoulos, associate general secretary for international affairs and peace at the NCC.

"If these recommendations are accepted by President Bush it would indicate that this administration is trying to dictate who our church ecumenical partners can be and how our humanitarian agencies can deliver aid to people who need it. That is an incredible intrusion into free exercise of religion," said Kireopoulos.

Although both the WCC and NCC are critical of the U.S. government's decision, neither seem bothered by the Cuban government's determination to control and repress religious institutions. From the U.S. Department of State:

While the Cuban constitution recognizes the right of citizens to freedom of religion, the government de facto restricts that freedom. Twenty-two denominations, including Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Methodists, are members of the Cuban Council of Churches (CCC). Most CCC members are officially recognized by the State, though several, including the Evangelical Lutheran Church, are not registered and are recognized only through their membership in the CCC. Another 31 officially recognized denominations, including Jehovah's Witnesses and the small Jewish community, do not belong to the CCC. The government does not favor any one particular religion or church; however, the government appears to be most tolerant of those churches that maintain close relations to the State through the CCC. Unregistered religious groups experience various degrees of official interference, harassment, and repression. The Ministry of Interior engages in active efforts to control and monitor the country's religious institutions, including through surveillance, infiltration and harassment of religious professionals and practitioners. The most independent religious organizations--including the Catholic Church, the largest independent institution in Cuba today--continue to operate under significant restrictions and pressure imposed on them by the Cuban regime. The Cuban Government continues to refuse to allow the church to have independent printing press capabilities; full access to the media; to train enough priests for its needs or allow adequate numbers of foreign priests to work in the country; or to establish socially useful institutions, including schools and universities, hospitals and clinics, and nursing homes. All registered denominations must report to the Ministry of Interior's Office of Religious Affairs.

_______________ 

 

   

LINKS

Links that appear on this site are for informational purposes and should not be considered an endorsement

United Church of Christ

Still Speaking

Global Ministries

Our Faith, Our Vote

UCC Coalition for GLBT Concerns

Biblical Witness Fellowship (BWF)

Southern Conference Renewal Network

Evangelical Association

Faithful and Welcoming

UCC Unity

Philosophy Over Coffee

Kirkogitation

UCC Directory (including the Executive Council)

 

CONFERENCE

WEB SITES

California-Nevada, Northern

California-Nevada, Southern

Calvin Synod

Central Atlantic

Central Pacific

Connecticut

Florida

Hawaii

Illinois

Illinois South

Indiana-Kentucky

Iowa

Kansas-Oklahoma

Maine

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Missouri Mid-South

Montana-Northern Wyoming

Nebraska

New Hampshire

New York

Northern Plains

Ohio

Pacific Northwest

Penn Central

Penn Northeast

Pennsylvania Southeast

Penn West

Rhode Island

Rocky Mountain

South Central

Southeast

Southern

Southwest

Vermont

Wisconsin

 

HOME | THE POINT | THE ARCHIVE | THE BOARD

 

Legal Disclaimer:

This site is not affiliated with the United Church of Christ and should not be confused as a being representative of the United Church of Christ,

it's conferences, associations or members. The views expressed on this site are those of the respective authors alone.