|



Charity Navigator is
America's premier independent charity evaluator.
They help charitable givers make intelligent
giving decisions by providing in-depth,
objective ratings and analysis of the financial
health of America's largest charities. Use
Charity Navigator's simple searchable database
to find a charity you can trust and support. |
|
July 30, 2006
CT union boycott
suspended,
John Thomas
embarrassed... again

According to the
Hartford Courant, the union boycott of the Connecticut Convention
Center, which caused the UCC to relocate the 2007 General Synod, has
now been suspended as part of a "cooling off period". Apparently,
the UCC was the only major group to react to the boycott.
From the Hartford Courant:
The
one major convention that relocated
out of the convention center and
hotel - the 2007 national convention
of the United Church of Christ -
took advantage of a state-funded
bailout to move its events to the
nearby Civic Center and keep its
event in Hartford.
|

At the time the UCC announced it was
supporting the boycott,
UCC President John Thomas claimed that "the UCC has stood with
farm workers in California and with workers in Ohio and Michigan and
other parts of the country. Now it is time to stand with convention
workers and hotel workers in Hartford." Connecticut Conference
Minister Davida Foy Crabtree added that "there is a water theme
going on here. We are standing here in the rain, we are standing
here by the river and I am remembering a scripture that says let
justice roll down like water and righteousness like an ever-flowing
stream."

Apparently, Thomas and Crabtree
weren't talking to workers at the Connecticut Convention
Center. Also from the Hartford
Courant:


This is nothing short of another
major embarrassment for the UCC national office and Connecticut
Conference Minister, Davida Foy Crabtree. Not only is the UCC
sapping Connecticut taxpayers of $100,000 to relocate our General
Synod in a constitutionally questionable deal, there was no real
"justice" issue and the national office's support of the boycott
only hurt the workers they were pretending to support.

Crabtree was right about one thing:
"there is a water theme going on here".... and she is all wet.
_______________

July 28, 2006
Conference Ministers
respond to 'Faithful and Welcoming Churches'

Conference Ministers
are circulating a new document titled
"Faithful and Welcoming Churches: A Position Statement". The
paper was written by Rev. Gene Kraus, Interim Conference Minister of
the Illinois South Conference and has been endorsed by the Council
of Conference Ministers of the United Church of Christ. The paper is
surprisingly proactive. The paper identifies three areas of
agreement and five areas of disagreement. While there are some key
points that we're sure FWC will disagree with, there is a least a
starting point for some positive dialog ~ which is surprising
considering how negative conference ministers have been with any
dissent within the UCC. It's 17 pages and definitely
worth reading.
_______________

July 28, 2006
Thomas changes tune on
Middle East conflict... sort of

UCC President John
Thomas, with
Cally Rogers-Witte. Executive
Minister of
Wider Church Ministries, issued a new statement on the Middle East
conflict.
From the statement:
We
are witnesses to a Middle East weary
for peace yet enflamed once again in
violence. We mourn the death of all
those killed in Lebanon, Israel and
Gaza, and despair for the lives and
land indelibly scarred by the
violence. All sides must stop the
killing and devastation. The United
States and international community
must work diplomatically and
urgently to reach a cease-fire
between Hezbollah and Israel, and
Hamas and Israel, and to pursue
negotiations toward a sustainable
peace in the
Arab-Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
All nations should resist exploiting
the current conflict to further
political or ideological aims in the
region. Neither security, hegemony,
nor democracy can be achieved by
continuing and widening the
violence.
|

At least with this statement, it's
clear that Thomas is beginning to learn that if he is going to open
his mouth on this issue, he needs to address the multiple dimensions
and not exclusively attack the actions of Israel... but he still has
work to do. If nothing else,
he get's points for not
taking another cheap shot at Jewish groups.
While he is full condemnation for
nearly everyone involved, he's careful not to say anything negative
about Hamas. Intentional or not, Thomas's words really don't mean
anything anymore. He long ago lost any credibility on this issue and
he really isn't contributing any intellectual or spiritual capital -
who cares what Thomas thinks about the Middle East?

Yes, besides this site.

Seriously - who is this
really directed to? UCC members? Congress? Our 'friends' in the
Middle East?
_______________

July 20, 2006
The Wiesenthal Center
Responds to John Thomas

The Simon Wiesenthal Center
has responded to UCC President John Thomas's "Pastoral Letter" to
Palestinians. Below is a copy of both letters:

A
Pastoral Letter to Palestinian Friends and Partners
from UCC President John Thomas

Dear
Sisters and Brothers in Christ:

As I write this letter, dear
friends, the military and
humanitarian crisis intensifies
around you. We watch with horror and
outrage as Israel punishes an entire
population for the kidnapping of an
Israeli soldier in Gaza, and as
belligerence escalates with Hizb
Allah’s attack on military personnel
near Lebanon. While we pray for the
Israeli soldiers’ release and safe
return to family, we also know that
these incidents have become an
occasion for the further oppression
of the Palestinian community, for
the massive destruction of economic
infrastructure and for the tragic
loss of much innocent life.
Meanwhile, the separation barrier
continues to restrict travel, even
for the purpose of meeting desperate
human need, and sanctions against
the Palestinian Authority have
caused a financial strangulation of
vital political, educational and
humanitarian institutions. The
complicity of our own government in
these sanctions is cause for
particular grief.

Making this situation even more
burdensome is the recognition that
there are many in the United States,
including many Christians, who see
only Israel’s need for security, who
focus only on a few terrorist acts
which you yourselves condemn. In
doing so, they largely ignore the
systemic oppression of an entire
people in what increasingly amounts
to a virtual prison in which almost
every aspect of Palestinian life is
controlled by Israel. Many in our
own churches are subject to intense
lobbying by Jewish groups demonizing
the Palestinian community in
general, and many of you in
particular. Even some of our
denominational gatherings of
ecumenical partners here in the
United States sound what may seem to
you to be an uncertain voice.

In the face of such suffering and
the temptation for despair, I write
to assure you of the prayers and
solidarity of the United Church of
Christ. I am grateful that this is
being signified personally by Peter
Makari’s presence in the region this
summer, accompanied by several of my
colleagues. Know that we continue to
be guided by our commitment to peace
with justice, to negotiations
leading toward a future in which
Israel and Palestine mutually
co-exist within secure and
internationally recognized borders,
to a shared Jerusalem, and to full
protection and access to holy sites.
In addition, we remain steadfast in
our denunciation of Israel’s
separation barrier, articulated in
last summer’s General Synod
resolution, and in our readiness to
use our church’s economic resources,
including the possibility of
divestment, to press for an end to
the Occupation and to support
peacemaking and the Palestinian
community. Finally, we will not
remain silent in the face of our own
government’s policies which continue
to reward Israel while failing to
press in significant ways for the
“road map” it has proposed.

Centuries ago, in the midst of
equally urgent times, our Reformed
forebears asked, “What is your only
comfort in life and in death?” They
answered, “that we belong, body and
soul, in life and in death, not to
ourselves but to our faithful savior
Jesus Christ.” May this comfort
sustain you, and may the knowledge
that we belong together in bonds of
mutual affection and shared
commitment be encouraging in these
desperately challenging days.

In Christ,

John H. Thomas
General Minister and President
United Church of Christ (USA)
|
|
Response to UCC President John Thomas from The Simon
Wiesenthal Center

Dear President
Thomas,

We appreciate the clarity of your “Pastoral Letter
to Palestinian Friends and Partners.” You have made
the sides abundantly clear. On one side are Israel,
the United States, the G8, Saudi Arabia, Egypt,
Jordan, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. All of
these faulted the unprovoked murderous cross-border
attacks and kidnappings by Hezbollah that have led
to suffering of the citizens of both Israel and
Lebanon. On the other side are Hamas, Hezbollah,
Iran, Syria, the UCC and John Thomas, who see things
differently. We also understand why your remarks
during this week of death and misery address only
the suffering of your Palestinian friends. History
teaches that silence is admittance and your silence
over innocent Jewish victims speaks volumes.

We would have thought that your hostility against
the Jewish state in the past would have been
tempered by developments of the past year, even
before the Hezbollah attacks. Israel’s painful
dismantling of her Gaza communities; the Palestinian
response in directing hundreds of Kassams into
civilian populations within Israel’s internationally
recognized pre-1967 borders, and then electing a
Hamas government; the rabid hatemongering of Iran’s
Ahmadinejad (which you yourself noted and reacted
against) - any of these might have provided you with
an opportunity to add some new words in your
lexicon, like balance and responsibility. Instead,
you piously advise Israel to lay bare her Jewish,
Christian and Moslem citizens to continuous
murderous attacks by demanding the removal of the
anti-terrorism separation barrier without ever even
offering a suggestion of an alternative. You mourn
the degradation of Palestinian buildings, but ignore
the deliberate targeting of civilians in Israel,
including the two Israeli Arab children killed this
week by a Hezbollah rocket. You have nothing to say
about the hundreds upon hundreds of Kassams and
Katyushas that continue to rain down upon Israel’s
cities and towns, in the latest attempt to eradicate
the Jewish State.

Why now? Perhaps you provide cover for Hezbollah in
order to justify your previous behavior. Not too
many Americans have had the opportunity of face to
face meetings with Hezbollah, but when you first
encountered them, as you wrote in your travel diary
in 2003, you did so with an attitude of bemusement
that they were in the audience. Most Americans, we
think, would have bolted in distaste from those who
killed hundreds of Marines in Beirut. Has Che
Guevara replaced G-d in your theology, so that no
"underdog" can ever be called evil, no matter what
his actions or moral platform? And why have you
abandoned your Christian coreligionists in Lebanon!
Can you not see what even Arab heads of state and a
UN resolution have noted: that the people of Lebanon
are being used as human sandbags by Hezbollah and
their masters in Syria and Iran?

At least you are honest. You used to rail about the
pressure from the “pro-Israel lobby.” You’ve dropped
the code language. It’s Jews you’re talking about,
as you admit in your current letter. Your irritation
is puzzling, though. You have done a near perfect
job keeping those pesky Jews from your offices, and
from your convention floor when resolutions about
the fate of Israelis came up. If we didn’t know
better, we would think you simply don’t like outside
interference and pressure. But you have no problem
with the pressure from organizations like Sabeel and
Al-Awda, both of whom reject the legitimacy of a
Jewish state, and both of whom have either partnered
with the UCC, or have been listed as a resource. And
you don’t mind twisting a few arms yourself, do you?
Remember the infamous “midnight meeting” at your
General Synod in 2005, when you didn’t like the
committee recommendation to the floor, so you
substituted your own language, without anyone
realizing it and had delegates adopt a resolution
different from what they thought they were
approving?

Most confusing, perhaps, is what your bias and
hostility have to do with Christianity and Christian
love. Mercifully, you are not the only Christian
role model around. We hope that Jews and Christians
alike will not confuse your convoluted thinking with
the genuine regard and concern we have seen in other
circles, ranging from the Evangelical Right to our
very good friends in the Reformed traditions, such
as those who successfully led the battle at the
recent Presbyterian General Assembly to rewrite
policies on divestment and the security fence that
were unfair and unbalanced.

In Israel, united in its determination to end the
scourge of missiles in the hands of terrorists,
people nonetheless stop to read, think, and debate
about the calamitous effects of war on people on the
other side of the border, particularly civilians. In
the midst of their trying circumstances, with two
million Israelis in the north hunkering down in
shelters, they find room to commiserate with others.
Here in America, leaders of other church groups,
including those who differ politically with Israel’s
decisions, responded to the losses of both Israelis
and Lebanese. We strongly suspect that peace will
only become possible when both sides at least
acknowledge the pain and suffering of the other,
even as they pursue their separate agendas. Failure
to evidence that mutuality of pain was a missed
opportunity for you to teach others what undoubtedly
is in the hearts of many of the rank and file of the
UCC.

We hope and pray that the good will and good sense
that serves as the basis for Christian-Jewish
relations in America will continue to prevail, and
that one day you too may know the blessings of its
spirit.

Rabbi Yitzchok
Adlerstein
Director, Interfaith Affairs

Rabbi Abraham Cooper
Associate Dean
-The Simon Wiesenthal
Center |
|
_______________

July 20, 2006
Davida
Foy Crabtree defends UCC advocacy

The recent dustup over a
Congressional candidate's affiliation with the UCC has spawned new
discussion about the UCC's advocacy on Middle-East issues. It is
interesting to see how defensive UCC leaders, like Connecticut
Conference Minister Davida Foy Crabtree, have gotten now that the
media is asking questions about the UCC's position. In response,
the
Connecticut Conference has published an article addressing these
issues by highlighting a statement from Crabtree:

Connecticut Conference
Minister Davida Foy
Crabtree said,
in
a statement,
"The Middle East is
fraught with complexity,
never more so than now.
The United Church of
Christ stands united
against all forms of
terrorism and it has
certainly never
'justified suicide
bombings.' We affirm our
Middle East partners'
clear opposition to
violence and suicide
bombings."

In
reality, the 2005
resolutions specifically
condemn terrorism and
violence on the part of
all parties to the
Middle East conflict.
The resolution
Concerning Use of
Economic Leverage for
Promoting Peace in the
Middle East
does not name any
particular group as a
target for economic
action. Instead, it
calls upon UCC bodies to
support demilitarization
of the region, to
support peacemaking
organizations, and to
work to change the
behavior of
organizations that
profit from the
perpetuation of
violence.
|

Crabtree is right - Israel was not
specifically targeted in the "Economic Leverage" resolution but her
comment is extremely disingenuous since, in reality, you can only
divest assets from publicly traded companies. Since there is no way
to divest from Hamas terrorists making homemade bombs, effectively
the UCC's resolution only targets companies doing business with
Israel. This is best demonstrated by UCC President
John Thomas's own words this week when he said "we remain
steadfast in our denunciation of Israel’s separation barrier,
articulated in last summer’s General Synod resolution, and in our
readiness to use our church’s economic resources, including the
possibility of divestment, to press for an end to the Occupation and
to support peacemaking and the Palestinian community."

Jewish groups weren't fooled either
when the resolutions were approved.
The Anti-Defamation League called the UCC leadership's aggressive
stand against Israel "deeply troubling" and
the Simon Wiesenthal Center called the UCC's anti-Israel resolutions
"functionally anti-Semitic".

Crabtree isn't fooling
anyone... except maybe herself.
_______________

July 19, 2006

UPDATE:
Solomonia chimes in: "It's quite
amazing that even now, with bombs exploding in Israel and open war
with Hizballah and Hamas, Thomas is still obsessing over the
security fence. Yikes."

UPDATE:
One of the "few terrorist acts" kills two
children in Nazareth


UCC
President John Thomas hits new low
The tenure of John
Thomas as President of the United Church of Christ hit a new low
this week with the publication of a "Pastoral Letter to Palestinian
Friends and Partners" in response to the escalation of violence in
the Middle-East. The letter, laced with strong anti-Israel rhetoric,
included a direct threat to divest church assets from companies that
do business in Israel.
From the "Pastoral
Letter":

Dear
Sisters and Brothers in Christ:

As I write this letter, dear
friends, the military and
humanitarian crisis intensifies
around you. We watch with horror and
outrage as Israel punishes an entire
population for the kidnapping of an
Israeli soldier in Gaza, and as
belligerence escalates with Hizb
Allah’s attack on military personnel
near Lebanon. While we pray for the
Israeli soldiers’ release and safe
return to family, we also know that
these incidents have become an
occasion for the further oppression
of the Palestinian community, for
the massive destruction of economic
infrastructure and for the tragic
loss of much innocent life.
Meanwhile, the separation barrier
continues to restrict travel, even
for the purpose of meeting desperate
human need, and sanctions against
the Palestinian Authority have
caused a financial strangulation of
vital political, educational and
humanitarian institutions. The
complicity of our own government in
these sanctions is cause for
particular grief.

Making this situation even more
burdensome is the recognition that
there are many in the United States,
including many Christians, who see
only Israel’s need for security, who
focus only on a few terrorist acts
which you yourselves condemn. In
doing so, they largely ignore the
systemic oppression of an entire
people in what increasingly amounts
to a virtual prison in which almost
every aspect of Palestinian life is
controlled by Israel. Many in our
own churches are subject to intense
lobbying by Jewish groups demonizing
the Palestinian community in
general, and many of you in
particular. Even some of our
denominational gatherings of
ecumenical partners here in the
United States sound what may seem to
you to be an uncertain voice.

In the face of such suffering and
the temptation for despair, I write
to assure you of the prayers and
solidarity of the United Church of
Christ. I am grateful that this is
being signified personally by Peter
Makari’s presence in the region this
summer, accompanied by several of my
colleagues. Know that we continue to
be guided by our commitment to peace
with justice, to negotiations
leading toward a future in which
Israel and Palestine mutually
co-exist within secure and
internationally recognized borders,
to a shared Jerusalem, and to full
protection and access to holy sites.
In addition, we remain steadfast in
our denunciation of Israel’s
separation barrier, articulated in
last summer’s General Synod
resolution, and in our readiness to
use our church’s economic resources,
including the possibility of
divestment, to press for an end to
the Occupation and to support
peacemaking and the Palestinian
community. Finally, we will not
remain silent in the face of our own
government’s policies which continue
to reward Israel while failing to
press in significant ways for the
“road map” it has proposed.

Centuries ago, in the midst of
equally urgent times, our Reformed
forebears asked, “What is your only
comfort in life and in death?” They
answered, “that we belong, body and
soul, in life and in death, not to
ourselves but to our faithful savior
Jesus Christ.” May this comfort
sustain you, and may the knowledge
that we belong together in bonds of
mutual affection and shared
commitment be encouraging in these
desperately challenging days.

In Christ,

John H. Thomas
General Minister and President
United Church of Christ (USA)
|

Thomas's letter is
closer to something we would expect to see from Iranian President
Mahmud Ahmadinejad than a Christian leader and only serves to not
just isolate himself and the UCC from the Jewish community, but from
the broader mainline Christian community that clearly does not share
his extreme views.

It's hard to imagine how
much hate was going through John Thomas's heart when he wrote this
'pastoral letter'. What Thomas called "a
few terrorist acts" include 800 rocket attacks targeting Israel that
"were at best indiscriminate attacks in civilian areas and at worst
the deliberate targeting of civilians"
according to Human Rights Watch. Thomas's characterization that
Jewish groups have lobbied churches to demonize Palestinians "in
general" is plainly false. Widely respected Jewish groups, such as
the Anti-Defamation League and the Wiesenthal Center, merely
challenged the UCC's General Synod anti-Israel resolutions and
questioned our denomination's strong affiliation with Sabeel
which has "openly
questioned Israel's right to exist".

And... for what it's
worth... Thomas's threat of divestment is empty. He has no control
of any UCC investments and the UCC Pension Boards
made it
clear to Thomas after he pushed divestment at the last General
Synod that they will "adhere to a strict interpretation of our
fiduciary responsibility".

It is sincerely sad to
see the leader of our denomination implode in such an irrational and
public way. We can only feel sorry for him.
_______________

July 18, 2006
Details
of CT deal for General Synod emerge

Details of the deal that
moved the UCC's General Synod from the Connecticut Convention Center
to the Hartford Civic Center have emerged.
From the Waterbury
Connecticut Republican American newspaper:

Gov.
M. Jodi Rell "made it clear that we
did not want to lose the event,"
said Judd Everhart, a spokesman for
Rell. "This was a huge convention
that the governor wanted to make
sure stayed in Hartford."

The subsidy will come from the
state's quasi-public Capital City
Economic Development Authority, or
CCEDA, which owns the convention
center, and from the Greater
Hartford Convention & Visitors
Bureau. The subsidy is "larger than
usual," said Michael Cicchetti,
CCEDA assistant director, but not
entirely unheard of as cities vie to
host conventions that have a large
economic impact.

"This was a unique circumstance and
you cannot look at it in a vacuum,"
he said. "There will be a huge
benefit to Hartford as attendees
stay in hotels, eat at restaurants
and spend their money in the city."

Very often, he said, organizers pay
for local transportation costs or
the cost of an opening banquet to
woo conventioneers.

In the UCC case, he said, it is
necessary to look at the "totality
of the circumstance" and a host of
other factors that ensure
Connecticut does not become a loser
in the convention game.

"We cannot eat any cost and we have
to keep in mind our business," said
Laura Brubaker, a spokeswoman for
Madison Square Garden, which runs
the civic center, adding that no
additional fee is being charged. In
a statement, MSG said it was pleased
it was able to accommodate the UCC
meeting.
|

Americans
United for Separation of Church and State is investigating the deal between the Governor of Connecticut,
the UCC and the Hartford Civic Center to keep the UCC General Synod
in Connecticut.
_______________

July 17, 2006
EXCLUSIVE - MUST
CREDIT UCCTRUTHS.COM
CT Congressional
candidate in another UCC-related controversy

Thursday, July 18 PM
Update... First Church of Hartland UCC pastor says that the
Hartland Boulevard address used for MacLean's filing is his
residence

In another twist to the congressional
"campaign-turned-soap opera" in Connecticut's 1st district, new
questions have arisen about candidate Scott MacLean's ties to the
United Church of Christ. According to public notices published in
the Hartford Courant and other Connecticut newspapers, the
address MacLean used to file his candidacy (3 Hartland Boulevard,
East Hartland, CT 06027) matches public records for a tax-exempt
property owned by
First Church of Hartland UCC. MacLean is a retired, ordained UCC
minister and is currently the early morning Newscast Director at
WFSB-TV, Channel 3 in Hartford.

Emails to MacLean and to First Church of Hartland UCC for comment
were not returned as of late this afternoon.

|
Last month, UCCtruths.com first reported that
MacLean had invited supporters to a campaign meeting at First
Church of Hartland UCC's Parish Hall which is located at 5 Hartland
Boulevard ~ across the street from the church. Public records from
2004 (the only year for available information on the property)
indicate that the 3 Hartland Boulevard property that MacLean used to
file for candidacy is also owned by the church and is tax exempt for
religious purposes.

While Connecticut voters and the state will have to sort out
MacLean's residency status, First Church of Hartland UCC may have
violated it's tax exempt status if it knowingly participated in
MacLean's campaign.
According to the United Church of Christ's "Guidelines for
Congregations and Clergy on Political Action", almost all
churches are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3)
|
|
IRS Warns Churches to Avoid Campaigning

7/18/2006 LOS
ANGELES (AP) -- The Internal Revenue Service has
been warning churches and nonprofit
organizations that improper campaigning in the
upcoming political season could endanger their
tax-exempt status.

In notices to more than 15,000 tax-exempt
organizations, numerous church denominations and
tax preparers, the agency has detailed its new
enforcement program, called the Political
Activity Compliance Initiative, the Los Angeles
Times reported Tuesday.
Full article... |
|
of the Internal Revenue Code on the
basis that they are “operated exclusively for religious, charitable
or educational purposes." A 501 (c)(3) exempt
organization may not “participate in, or intervene in any political
campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office.” In his
original meeting invitation, MacLean claimed that "the good folks
from the First Church in Hartland-Congregational (my home church)
have graciously let me use the Parish Hall for campaign meetings."
MacLean has since claimed that no meeting took place although he
reserves the right to hold meetings there in the future.

As reported last month, the MacLean
controversy comes on the heels of a controversy in Ohio where two
megachurches are being accused of illegal political activities for
their support of Republican candidate for Governor, Ken Blackwell. A
group of Columbus clergy, headed by UCC minister Eric Williams, has
filed a complaint with the IRS questioning the tax-exempt status of
the churches. The complaint alleges that the megachurches have used
their churches for partisan politics.
_______________

July 17, 2006
UCC / Congressional
candidate links makes national news

The heated congressional
campaign in Connecticut's 1st District continues to make news and
the link between MacLean and the United Church of Christ seems to be
the primary focus. From the
Associated Press:


While Masullo's words are strong and
sharp, MacLean is foolishly wasting time defending UCC leaders - our
denomination's leaders do not have a clean record on issues that
relate to the Middle-East, Israel and domestic terrorism. Whether
the issue is the
UCC
leadership's support of divestment from Israel, support for the
removal of Israel's protective wall,
criticism of the
U.S. position on Iran's nuclear development (which turned out to be
real),
UCC President John Thomas's claim that the
Axis of Evil
“runs the length and breadth of Pennsylvania Avenue"
or UCC
leaders defense of Puerto Rican terrorists (FALN) in testimony to
Congress (with literally no regard or communication with bombing
victims) - our denominational leaders response on issues
important to all voters should raise public concern. MacLean dodged
addressing his position on these important issues and instead
quipped "while I don't agree with everything that comes out of the
national setting of the UCC, I don't agree with everything my wife
says either, and I have no intention of divorcing either one".
Whether MacLean likes it or not, he made his religious affiliation
an issue when he invited campaign supporters to meet at a local UCC
church (and reserves the right to do so in
the future). No one is asking MacLean to divorce our church, but
the voters of Connecticut's first district who are concerned about the Middle-East, Israel and domestic
terrorism deserve to understand the positions of all candidates.
_______________

July 13, 2006
UCC becomes subject of
political campaign in Connecticut

According to United
Church News, The UCC itself has become the subject of a heated
congressional campaign in Connecticut.
From
UC News:

The
UCC has become the subject of
political jabs in Connecticut, where
Miriam Masullo, a Republican
congressional primary candidate,
issued a five-page letter on July 5
criticizing the UCC as “leftist and
anti-Republican.” Her opponent for
the Republican nomination is the
Rev. Scott MacLean, an ordained UCC
minister who has won the endorsement
of the Republican Party
establishment.

MacLean and Masullo are both seeking
the Republican nod to challenge
incumbent First District Congressman
John B. Larson, a Democrat. The
primary will be held on Aug. 8.

"The political arm of the UCC is
actively waging a fight against
Republican values and principles
through a well-organized quest to
undermine the support that
Republican candidates get from what
we think of as the Christian Right,"
wrote Masullo in an "open letter to
the first district Republican
leadership."

Masullo accused the UCC of attacking
Ohio Republican Gubernatorial
candidate Kenneth Blackwell, of
promoting "economic sanctions
against an ally of the United States
in the war on terror," and of
espousing "immoral justification of
suicide bombings."

Masullo went on to criticize
MacLean, a member of First
Congregational UCC in Hartland,
Conn., for using the church building
for his political campaign meetings.

"[MacLean] has made no attempt to
disavow himself from the political
agenda of the UCC," Masullo wrote.

In response, MacLean said on July 11
that Masullo was "impugning the
integrity of my church."

"UCC churches grace the centers of
most New England towns because our
Pilgrim and Puritan ancestors were
the original English settlers in
Connecticut and our First Amendment
rights to freedom of religion and
freedom of speech sprang from the
noble efforts of these UCC
forebears," MacLean said in a press
release. "Politically liberal,
moderate and conservative members,
from all walks of life, are all
welcome in our diverse collection of
local churches and people are free
to follow their faith without
sacrificing their personal
conscience."

"While I don’t agree with everything
that comes out of the national
setting of the UCC, I don’t agree
with everything my wife says either
and I have no intention of divorcing
either one," MacLean continued.

"Like a good marriage, local UCC
congregations work through the tough
issues of our day with complete
transparency and a dignity of
process, respecting all points of
view," he said. "With a 400-year
tradition of local church autonomy
enshrined as the working principle
of our denomination, the national
setting of the church does not speak
'for the church' but rather, 'to the
church,' and each local congregation
is free to do with that input as
they wish."
|

Actually, it was UCCtruths.com which first raised the issue of
MacLean's invitation to use of the church to hold campaign meetings.
In an email received by UCCturths.com last evening from MacLean, he
conceded that he sent the email as an invitation to meet at the
church but denies that a meeting was ever held. From MacLean's
email:
This meeting was supposed to be held
last fall but no meeting took place
and there have not been any campaign
meetings at the parish hall.
However, it is perfectly legal to do
so if I choose to hold them there.
The Federal Election Commission
rules state, "The term
'contribution' does NOT include...
the use of real property, including
a church or community room used on a
regular basis by members of the
community for non commercial
purposes..." (Federal Election
Campaign Laws, compiled by the
Federal Election Commission,
September, 2004, page 2, Paragraph
8-B-ii)
|

MacClean also stated
that the invitation was forwarded to UCCtruths to "serve my
opponents highly partisan political purposes".

In response, I replied
that "the purpose of posting the content of the email was in no way
associated with partisanship and was clearly posted in context to
the church/state issues raised by other UCC ministers in the Ohio
governors race and the Governor of Connecticut's apparent financial
support of the UCC's next General Synod in Hartford - both of which
were reported on UCCtruths.com site some time ago."

There are some real
issues here and holding a campaign meeting at a church raises
legitimate questions about the separation of church and state.
Granted, MacLean claims he never held a campaign meeting at his
church - but he still insists that it's his right to do so. While
MacLean makes reference to federal election laws on campaign
contributions, the issue raised by UCCtruths.com has nothing to do
with campaign finance laws, it's about the separation of church and
state.
_______________

July 12, 2006
WCC and NCC critical
of government decision on Cuban Council of Churches

United Church News is
reporting on the dismay of the World Council of Churches that the
U.S. government is planning to restrict the type of aid that can be
funneled through the Cuban Council of Churches.
From
UC News:
"We strongly feel that it is
completely inappropriate for the
U.S. Government, or any government,
to determine who is and who is not a
legitimate national council of
churches, and to restrict or deny
Christian fellowship and
humanitarian assistance to any
particular national church council,
including the Cuban Council of
Churches," said [World Council of
Churches general secretary, Rev.
Samuel] Kobia.
|

The National Council of
Churches has also chimed in on the controversy.
From the NCC:
"We have had an
ecumenical relationship with the
Cuban Council of Churches for a long
time, as have churches and councils
of churches around the world," said
Dr. Antonios Kireopoulos, associate
general secretary for international
affairs and peace at the NCC.

"If these
recommendations are accepted by
President Bush it would indicate
that this administration is trying
to dictate who our church ecumenical
partners can be and how our
humanitarian agencies can deliver
aid to people who need it. That is
an incredible intrusion into free
exercise of religion," said
Kireopoulos.
|

Although both the WCC
and NCC are critical of the U.S. government's decision, neither seem
bothered by the Cuban government's determination to control and
repress religious institutions.
From the U.S.
Department of State:

While the Cuban constitution
recognizes the right of citizens to
freedom of religion, the government
de facto restricts that freedom.
Twenty-two denominations, including
Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and
Methodists, are members of the Cuban
Council of Churches (CCC). Most CCC
members are officially recognized by
the State, though several, including
the Evangelical Lutheran Church, are
not registered and are recognized
only through their membership in the
CCC. Another 31 officially
recognized denominations, including
Jehovah's Witnesses and the small
Jewish community, do not belong to
the CCC. The government does not
favor any one particular religion or
church; however, the government
appears to be most tolerant of those
churches that maintain close
relations to the State through the
CCC. Unregistered religious groups
experience various degrees of
official interference, harassment,
and repression. The Ministry of
Interior engages in active efforts
to control and monitor the country's
religious institutions, including
through surveillance, infiltration
and harassment of religious
professionals and practitioners.
The most independent religious
organizations--including the
Catholic Church, the largest
independent institution in Cuba
today--continue to operate under
significant restrictions and
pressure imposed on them by the
Cuban regime. The Cuban Government
continues to refuse to allow the
church to have independent printing
press capabilities; full access to
the media; to train enough priests
for its needs or allow adequate
numbers of foreign priests to work
in the country; or to establish
socially useful institutions,
including schools and universities,
hospitals and clinics, and nursing
homes. All registered denominations
must report to the Ministry of
Interior's Office of Religious
Affairs.
|
_______________

|

LINKS
Links that appear on
this site are for informational purposes and should not be
considered an endorsement










UCC Unity



UCC Directory
(including the Executive Council)
CONFERENCE
WEB SITES




|