|
|
|
Archive
From September, 2005:

September 30, 2005
UCC Office of Communication, Inc.
Outdated media advocacy group of
the UCC seeks relevance
Ask the rank-and-file of
the UCC if they have ever heard of OC Inc. and you'll probably get a
blank stare. The Office of Communication, Inc. (OC Inc. for short)
is the media advocacy arm of the United Church of Christ - a legacy
of the UCC's fight in the civil rights era when media options were
limited to a few television and radio stations where the programming
didn't reflect the ethnic diversity of the audience, primarily in
the south. A generation ago, OC Inc. was influential and carried
weight. Their support of an initiative in front of the FCC gave it
instant credibility.

Today, however, OC Inc. is a relic of
a generation that was dependant on public airwaves for information.
Challenges by OC Inc. to the FCC are rarely successful and often
reflect personal, political grudges. In an effort to broaden
influence and credibility, OC Inc. has even partnered with
Issue Dynamics, a lobbying firm
for the telecommunications industry. In 2003, OC Inc. partnered with
Issue Dynamics in a
campaign against WorldCom on behalf of WorldCom's competitors
who had everything to gain by the demise of WorldCom. Separately,
Issue Dynamics, dutifully defending their telecom clients, is
currently part of a campaign against municipal
Wi-Fi initiatives that would bring low cost wireless broadband
access to cities like Philadelphia, in part, to bring internet
access to those who can't afford it to help break the "digital
divide". The UCC and OC Inc. would like you to think their
initiatives are about the "public interest" but instead of
challenging it's own partner, Issue Dynamics, the UCC and OC Inc.
would rather play
political games. If OC Inc. was serious about serving the
"public interest" and in breaking the "digital divide," it should
start by focusing it's energies where it might be most effective.

The world has changed
and the information age we live in is becoming less dependent on the
conventional broadcast media that existed when OC Inc. was
originally created. It's time to consider a different mission for OC
Inc.
_______________

September 30, 2005
Former Hawaiian UCC
Moderator blasts General
Synod apology
(headline corrected 1/8/2006)
Interesting article in the
Hawaii Reporter that's based on an apology issued by General Synod
in 1993 for the Congregational Church's role in over-throwing the
Queen.
From the article...

| |
The United Church of Christ
apology grew from a resolution presented by Rev. Dr. Wallace
Ryan Kuroiwa at the XVIII UCC General Synod without dialogue
and consensus by all the United Church of Christ Churches in
Hawaii. |

The article goes on to
say...

| |
The
apology by United Church of Christ is based on a flawed
premise that the Church was complicit in the overthrow of
the Queen in 1893. The Blount and Morgan Reports, including
Queen Liliuokalani autobiography, fail to identify any
complicity by the Church in the overthrow.

Without any evidence of complicity, there is no
justification for the call of an apology by the Church to
the Native Hawaiians. Thou shalt not bear false witness
against thy neighbor. Exodus 20:16 |
_______________

September 28, 2005
PSCE Conference minister gives
bizarre sermon on unity
Pennsylvania Southeast
Conference Minister F. Russell Mitman has posted a sermon on PSCE
web site on unity titled
"Christ-minded-ness". Mitman has recently been criticized for
sending out a mass email stating that
"church-stealers" which "may be aligned with and even funded by
ultra-right-wing political lobbies" were "seeking to lure churches
away". In his email, Mitman doesn't offer any evidence that
there is
a conspiracy to lure churches away. In his bizarre sermon, Mitman
compares being called a liar to the sacrifice of Christ and the
martyrdom of Bonhoeffer... again without substantiating any of his
previous claims that churches were being stolen away.

Since the whole matter
of churches being stolen away sounds incredible, I asked Mitman for
clarification of his sermon and his response was "no comment" -
which is his right. But as a conference minister, he has to be both
responsible and accountable for the comments he makes about churches
within his conference and his email and sermon simply aren't
credible without more information.
_______________

September 26, 2005
Jewish Leaders
challenge anti-Semitic statements from Sabeel leader Naim Ateek,
call for an end to divestment campaign
Last week's trip to Israel
by a delegation of American mainline churches and American Jewish
communities,
hailed as a success by the National Council of Churches,
included a visit to Rev. Dr. Naim Ateek,
leader of Sabeel Center which is responsible for the divestment
campaigns undertaken by a few mainline churches including the United
Church of Christ. From the
Anti-Defamation League:

| |
During a September 22
meeting in Jerusalem, Rabbi Bretton-Granatoor, along with
other Jewish leaders, questioned Rev. Ateek about his
position on Israel's legitimate right to exist, citing
quotations from his book, "Justice and Only Justice: A
Palestinian Theology of Liberation" (1989), in which he
wrote, "It has taken me years to accept the establishment of
the state of Israel and its need – although not its right –
to exist."

"We read to him several quotations from his sermons and
writings that we believed denied the legitimate right of the
Jewish people to live in their land, and echoed medieval
anti-Semitic canards," Rabbi Bretton-Granatoor said. "He
affirmed that he continues to support the suggestion that if
Israel had a right to exist, it should have been created
somewhere else, but not on the Holy Land.

"We accept it may not be his intent to disseminate
anti-Semitism, but we made it clear that was what has been
done," added the rabbi. "We hope that he may reconsider his
language and imagery.
But the significance of this is that those people and
those churches that use Sabeel's writings and theology to
support their political point of view potentially may be
considered accessories in the advancement of anti-Semitic
theology." |

Ateek has been a darling
of UCC national leaders and was a
keynote
speaker at the UCC's 2003 General Synod. Unfortunately, the
story many in the UCC hear about Ateek and the Sabeel Center is
incomplete and ignores the anti-Semitism that comes from Ateek and
Sabeel.

The
Anti-Defamation League also notes:

| |
Jewish participants expressed the hope that the mission
would lead to concrete steps by the leadership of the
Protestant churches to cancel their divestment campaign
against Israel and instead focus on positive opportunities
to invest in the many hopeful programs that enhance peaceful
co-existence between Palestinians and Israelis. |

Apparently, the UCC
wasn't listening as denomination leaders are sponsoring a Divestment
Conference in Toronto next month.
_______________

September 21, 2005
United Church of Christ Sponsoring Divestment
Conference
The United Church of
Christ is sponsoring a divestment
conference in Toronto, Canada on October 26 - 29. The
conference, titled "A Call for Morally
| Responsible Investment: A
Nonviolent Response to the Israeli Occupation," is being presented
by the Canadian Friends of Sabeel. In an email invitation for the
event, the United Church of Christ resolution on "Economic
Leverage" is |
|
linked to the Presbyterian Divestment Resolution - even though UCC President John Thomas denied as much at a press conference
following the General Synod vote. From the invitation:

| |
Official pronouncements
from mainstream Protestant denominations on church
investment strategies was initiated by the Presbyterian
Church USA in its 216th General Assembly last year when it
approved several measures opposing the Israeli occupation of
Palestine, including a call for its corporate witness office
to begin gathering data to support a selective divestment of
holdings in multinational corporations doing business in
Israel/Palestine... There followed similar statements and
resolutions from the World Council of Churches, the Anglican
Consultative Council,
the United Church of
Christ,
various conferences of the United Methodist Church, and
others, which have established a new strategy for working
for a just peace for western Christians. |

The United Church of
Christ is also listed as one of three "Co-sponsoring Friends of the
Conference" which appears to mean that our denomination has
contributed "at
least US$2,000 to this effort" according to sponsorship
information on the web site.
_______________

September 21, 2005
Best selling liberal author
raps UCC on divestment
Rabbi Harold Kushner,
author of the best selling 'Why Bad Things Happen To Good People',
spoke at Wayzata
Community Church (UCC) Monday about the rise of fundamentalism
in Christianity and Judaism. In the speech, he raps the UCC on the
divestment resolution passed at General Synod:

| |
I will tell you this in
all candor and with a certain measure of anguish - because
of I have so many friends, not only at Wayzata Community
Church, but in the UCC and in the Presbyterian and Episcopal
movements in much of the liberal Protestant world - I'm
embarrassed... I'm embarrassed at positions that some of the
liberal Protestant churches have taken advocating divestment
from Israel. Those are not balanced positions even if they
try to condemn both sides. It's like passing a law that says
"in an effort to reduce urban homicide, we insist that no
federal funds be spent on sending weapons to either the
police or the criminals". I'm sorry, that is not a balanced
statement. I'm afraid that the UCC at it's recent Atlanta
convention was seduced by a very slick propaganda campaign
into abandoning Christian principles and taking one side of
a very complex situation. |

His comments on
divestment were only a small part of this great speech. If you don't
do anything else today,
listen to Kushner's speech from Minnesota Public Radio (Real
Player Required) at Wayzata Community
Church.
_______________

September 20, 2005
Moral voice of the church
Pennsylvania Southeast
Conference Minister F. Russell Mitman has
sent out an email with recommendations
for those not happy with the General Synod Resolution on Gay
Marriage. The first idea is to write
Associate General
Minister Edith Guffey and the Executive Council of the UCC
requesting that changes be made to General Synod "that
allows the
moral voice of the church
to be raised and yet does so without forcing votes that make winners
and losers." The second idea is that
"each congregation will
be sent a form on which individual members who do not agree with the
resolution of the General Synod on marriage rights may sign their
names. These will be collected by the Conference staff, posted on
the Conference website, and forwarded as one composite document to
the office of General Minister and President in Cleveland."

Mitman is trying to be
reasonable here, but I think the premise of his ideas are
flawed. In our polity, there is no
"moral
voice of the church"
- this is for each local church to decide, not a national setting.
We are not the
Presbyterian Church and we are not the Methodist Church - we are
Congregational which places this voice squarely and unequivocally on
the local church

_______________

September 20, 2005
Remembering Simon Wiesenthal
From our friends at the
Wiesenthal Center:

 |
Simon Wiesenthal, the famous Nazi Hunter has died in Vienna
at the age of 96, the Simon Wiesenthal Center announced
today (September 20th).

"Simon Wiesenthal was the conscience of the Holocaust," said
Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the International
Human Rights NGO named in Mr. Wiesenthal’s honor, adding,
"When the Holocaust ended in 1945 and the whole world went
home to forget, he alone remained behind to remember. He did
not forget. He became the permanent representative of the
victims, determined to bring the perpetrators of the
history’s greatest crime to justice. There was no press
conference and no president or Prime Minister or world
leader announced his appointment. He just took the job. It
was a job no one else wanted. |
The task was overwhelming.
The cause had few friends. The Allies were already focused
on the Cold War, the survivors were rebuilding their
shattered lives and Simon Wiesenthal was all alone,
combining the role of both prosecutor and detective at the
same time."

Overcoming the world’s indifference and apathy, Simon
Wiesenthal helped bring over 1,100 Nazi War Criminals before
the Bar of Justice. |
_______________

September 16, 2005
First UCCtruths.com Book Discussion
set for October 18
We will be hosting our
first ever book discussion on the book,
Turn Neither to the
Right Nor to the Left - A Thinking Christian's Guide to Politics and
Public Policy
on
October 18th at 9pm EST with the author, D. Eric Schansberg in a live, online
chat session here at UCCtruths.com.

REGISTER
NOW BY CLICKING HERE

About the book
Schansberg establishes a frame work for discussing public policy and
turns to issues of social morality, then economic justice, and
finally, abortion. The analysis is thorough and his conclusions may
be surprising. You will never look at politics and public policy the
same way again!

About the Author
D. Eric Schansberg (Ph.D. Economics, Texas A&M University) is
Professor of Economics at Indiana University (New Albany). Eric is
the author of numerous academic articles and popular press essays—as
well as two other books: Poor Policy: How Government Harms the Poor
(Westview Press, 1996) and Inheriting Our Promised Land: Lessons in
Victorious Christian Living from the Book of Joshua (Alertness
Books, 2003). He is also the co-author (with Kurt Sauder) of a
21-month Discipleship Curriculum for Men. He is active in teaching
at his church and has led expository Bible studies for more than ten
years. Eric and his wife, Tonia, have three children (so far!) and
live in Jeffersonville, Indiana.

Where to buy:
Laissez Faire Books
or
Amazon.com
_______________

September 15, 2005

|
Special Commentary

How did we get here?

It is more than
a little disturbing to hear about the number of churches
leaving (or considering leaving) the denomination. The
national office doesn't seem to recognize that this is
approaching a crisis. The Conferences, however, are scared
enough to
distribute literature (and
this one too) that suggests that the churches
that are leaving are part of some elaborate scheme...
without any evidence whatsoever to support such dramatic
claims. It's unfortunate that our conference leaders have
had to resort to lying as a method of trying to keep
churches from leaving the denomination. It's certainly not
going to lead to resolution.

So... how did we
get here?

We are all to
blame for this.

ALL OF US... me, UCCtruths.com, the Southern Conference,
John Thomas
and yes... even radical moderates like Don and Steve from
our
message
boards.

Let me explain:

UCCtruths, Biblical Witness Fellowship, Lexington
Confession participants, etc. have become polarizing objects
in every debate. While our beliefs and missions are
different, our reaction to controversial issues is like
throwing gasoline on a fire. Being right (which I think I
am) is not the same as being effective in promoting positive
change. When I started the site, I wanted to ignite a
broader conversation that would get people thinking and
intentionally polarizing some issues that would force people
to react.

The results?

This site has
generated over 60,000 unique browsers in the last year and
over 200 message board participants with over 3,000
messages. My hope was that action and reaction would bring
resolution. It hasn't yet. But... this site has had an
effect on the national office and conferences (nearly a
quarter of daily browsers to the site come from a provider
or in house IP address that belongs to either the national
office or a conference office). On an almost daily basis
now, I get email from one or the other expressing their
concern about the site. But it's not necessarily good
attention... it has made them feel polarized and defensive,
and they are generally not reacting well to that. Without
overstating the importance of the site, this has had
consequences on the issues vigorously promoted on the site -
including divestment and the dissent in the Southern
Conference. Instead of influencing those in decision making
positions, we helped create an enemy. It makes the mission
of promoting change much more difficult.

Moderates in the church, who understand and appreciate
the many
concerns, are also to blame. Instead of using their even
limited influence to serve as a bridge, they acquiesce to
both the national office and those who are concerned. If the
priority is unity and recognition of covenant, then they
must speak up. They must feel a sense of obligation that
causes them to "work the system" to promote the needed
change. If moderates do not involve themselves into these
issues, there will be no resolution.

Cheerleaders in the church are to blame also. These
well-intentioned folks have their heads so far in the sand
that they don't understand why anyone in the world would
challenge our leaders. "Recognition" and "resolution" are
not part of their vocabulary because they would look at it
as a defeat. "Humility" is also not a word many would
ascribe to those holding leadership roles in our
denomination.

John Thomas
is also to blame. His leadership has been marked with a
number of "unpastoral" comments and actions. Whether he's
claiming that
the Axis of Evil "runs the length and breadth of
Pennsylvania Avenue", his unease about soldiers taking
communion on the battlefield, his premature "disappointment"
with the selection of the new Pope and his disruptive
participation to undermine a committee resolution on
"Economic Leverage" at General Synod are not qualities we
should expect from a church leader in our congregational
polity. In these difficult times for our denomination, he
should be focused on unity and not arbitrarily deciding who
is and who is not in covenant. His highest priority should
be meeting those in Southern Conference NOW, not in January.
He has become just another polarizing figure.

And finally...

Those who signed on to the Lexington Confession and all
of those
withholding OCWM funds are also to be blamed. You can't
expect a
vote (or influence) with the conference if you aren't
willing to contribute. Using OCWM monies as ransom will not
work. Staying a part of the church is the best opportunity
for change. Affiliate with whoever you want, but do not
quit the denomination under any circumstances. If John
Thomas and Steve Camp are serious, you can keep your OCWM
funds when they kick you out for affiliating with third
parties. If you leave now, you are quitters. If they
kick you out, they are behaving like the bouncers in the UCC
television ad. If you feel disenfranchised and think the
national office has broken covenant, turn the other cheek -
don't use it as an excuse to also break covenant. This about
being effective, not about being right.
-James Hutchins
(jhutchins_ucc@yahoo.com)
|
_______________

September 15, 2005
Southern Conference Churches Pushed
to the Brink
John Thomas draws line in the sand
on covenant
In a stern "pastoral"
letter to churches in the Southern Conference, UCC President John
Thomas has made clear that withholding OCWM money or affiliating
with the Evangelical Association are unacceptable forms of dissent.
From the letter:

| |
In this light, however,
it is important to say that the covenants we share include
not only our responsibility to engage one another in
respectful dialogue from a biblical and theological
perspective on crucial contemporary moral issues, but also
our commitments to pray for one another across the various
settings of the church, to honor those elected to
leadership in each setting, and to give financial
support to the whole mission of the whole church. For this
reason I want it to be clear that I support Steve Camp and
the leadership of the Conference, and affirm the pastoral
letter that provided clear boundaries around what is to
be considered acceptable expressions of dissent.
Withholding OCWM support, or aiding groups like the
Evangelical Association which encourage disruption of our
covenantal life, are not part of the legitimate and
appropriate expression of diversity in our common life.
(emphasis added) |

The letter is act of
desperation and it's disturbing on a number of levels:
-
His statement that
part of covenant is "to honor those elected to
leadership in each setting" doesn't feel right. What is his
definition of "honor" and where does dissent fit it with it?
-
In light if the fact
that he is not planning a trip to the
Southern Conference until January, this letter is premature.
Before
writing a letter like this, shouldn't he have at least spoken to
the
people who are concerned? Part of the reason for the breakdown
is a
sense that the concerns of some local churches are not being
heard.
The timing of the letter validates that concern.
-
John Thomas does not
justify in any way how affiliating with the
EA is a violation of covenant. For such a serious judgment, we
should
expect some rationale for it.
-
Is covenant a
one-way street? Where does John communicate what he
has done in the spirit of covenant with regards to the Southern
COnference and those who feel disenfranchised? It certainly
isn't
reflected in the lettter.
-
What authority does
John Thomas have to alone and arbitrarily
decide who is and who is not in covenant?
_______________

September 15, 2005
An
Informational Meeting in the Pennsylvania Southeastern Conference (PSEC)
by Guest Columnist, John
Loven

Read the ridiculous email sent by
Conference Minister F. Russell Mitman

St. John's
Reformed Church, a thriving congregation of about 850
members in Sinking Spring, PA separated from the UCC in
2002. They did so for some of the
|
same reasons many other churches have: Because the UCC has
moved away from the principles on which St. John's
was founded and still embraces, and because the "polity"
process is broken. Since the UCC General Synod of 2005, the
office at St. John’s has been deluged with phone calls from
people asking questions about their exit from the
denomination. They decided to address these requests by
holding a public informational meeting on Sunday, September
11, 2005, at which they could tell “St. John’s story.” A 2"
x 2" ad was placed in two local Pennsylvania papers saying
"Tired of Denominational Liberalism? There is an
alternative: Informational Meeting". |
 |

My wife and I attended the meeting on behalf of our
consistory. There were over 100 people present,
including a bus load from the upper Lehigh Valley, a
drive of several hours. Also in attendance were
Conference Minister Russ Mittman and Assistant
Conference Ministers Geneva Butz and Jonathon Knight of
the Pennsylvania Southeast Conference of the UCC.

Pastor Bill
Miller began the proceedings by reading from a recent
email Mittman had sent to the conference churches – very
much like ones we've seen from other conferences -
warning that well-funded right-wing groups are sending
agents provocateur into churches to steal them from the
denomination. (My own church is without a pastor and the
previous pastor had a private email address, so our
congregation never saw the document.)

Pastor Miller declared that:
Neither
he nor his church had ever done anything secretive
or underhanded
They
acted on their own initiative
They
paid for the ad and the meeting with members’
special voluntary contributions, since there was no
budget item for it.
And
anyone who asserted otherwise was a liar.
He also
invited anyone who might have come to be contentious, to
take names, or to intimidate others to leave. No one
left. By that time the conference brain-trust looked
visibly embarrassed, but remained motionless in their
seats. They observed the rest of the meeting, but did
not participate.

Pastor
Miller explained a well thought-out set of ground rules
for the session: There was to be no debate on, or
outbursts about, the issues. St. John’s would lay out a
detailed history of how they came to leave the UCC and
offer a set of “Lessons Learned” for anyone who was
interested.

Pastor
Miller went on to make a very skillful presentation of
St. John's story. Participants received handouts with
with details of the history and useful guidelines. The
presentation included testimony from a number of
congregation members about how they came to feel certain
that separation was the best thing to do. They strongly
endorsed a very careful and thoughtful process,
emphasizing "Don't rush, educate your congregation
thoroughly about all aspects and possibilities and
communicate extensively, prayerfully and well”.

Upon leaving
the UCC, St. John’s chose to affiliate with the
Evangelical Association of Reformed, Congregational and
Christian Churches (EA). St. John's affiliated with the
EA after looking closely at about ten options, including
the 4Cs, Reformed Church in America, and Evangelical
Free Church. They passed out a grid showing how six of
the options lined up on the issues they cared most
about. Issues included both theological topics (e.g. the
deity of Christ, ordination of homosexuals) and
organizational items (e.g. pension plans and health
care). Pastor Miller’s advice was "Don't go EA if your
congregation needs a lot of handholding" and stressed
that the EA was not a denomination, nor did it have much
funding. Being large and self-sufficient, St. John's
chose EA as the best fit for a number of other reasons.

A few
attendees had thought there would be more information
presented about the EA itself, but at the end of the
meeting, Pastor Miller merely said "I have more
information on the EA if anyone would like it." No one
was introduced as representing the EA.

The majority
of questions after the presentation had to do with
process issues: handling insurance, pensions and how to
prepare lay leadership to discuss their relationship
with the UCC. The message from St. John’s was again
“proceed with great deliberation and care.” Their
particular story, however, has turned out happily. All
the process, ownership and fiduciary issues were solved
and, three years later, they are well satisfied with the
results of their decision. Pastor Miller’s closing
comment was “We didn’t leave the UCC, it left us. And,
as you can see, there is life after separation.”

There was a
very friendly fellowship period afterward but the PSEC
Conference ministers made a bee-line for the exit
between the final prayer and the first cup of coffee.
|
_______________

September 13, 2005
The Plight of Palestinian Christians
From the
New York Sun:

| |
What some observers are
calling a pogrom took place near Ramallah, West Bank, on the
night of Sep. 3-4. That’s when fifteen Muslim youths from
one village, Dair Jarir, rampaged against Taybeh, a
neighboring all-Christian village of 1,500 people.

The reason for the assault? A Muslim woman from Dair Jarir,
Hiyam Ajaj, 23, fell in love with her Christian boss, Mehdi
Khouriyye, owner of a tailor shop in Taybeh. The couple
maintained a clandestine two-year affair and she became
pregnant in about March 2005. When her family learned of her
condition, it murdered her. That was on about Sep. 1;
unsatisfied even with this “honor killing” – for Islamic law
strictly forbids non-Muslim males to have sexual relations
with Muslim females – the Ajaj men sought vengeance against
Khouriyye and his family.

They took it two days later in an assault on Taybeh. The
Ajajs and their friends broke into houses and stole
furniture, jewelry, and electrical appliances. They threw
Molotov cocktails at some buildings and poured kerosene on
others, then torched them. The damage included at least 16
houses, some stores, a farm, and a gas station. The
assailants vandalized cars, looted extensively, and
destroyed a statue of the Virgin Mary.

“It was like a war,” one Taybeh resident told The Jerusalem
Post. Hours passed before the Palestinian Authority security
and fire services arrived. The fifteen assailants spent only
a few hours in police detention, then were released. As for
Khouriyye, the Palestinian police arrested him, kept him
jail, and (his family says) have repeatedly beat him. |

By now you are wondering
what this has to do with the UCC... continued from the article:

| |
The campaign of
persecution has succeeded. Even as the Christian population
of Israel grows, that of the Palestinian Authority shrinks
precipitously. Bethlehem and Nazareth, historic Christian
towns for nearly two millennia, are now primarily Muslim. In
1922, Christians outnumbered Muslims in Jerusalem; today,
Christians amount to a mere 2 percent of that city’s
population.

“Is Christian life liable to be reduced to empty church
buildings and a congregation-less hierarchy with no flock in
the birthplace of Christianity?” So asks Daphne Tsimhoni in
the Middle East Quarterly. It is hard to see what will
prevent that ghost-like future from coming into existence.

One factor that could help prevent this dismal outcome would
be for mainline Protestant churches to speak out against
Palestinian Muslims for tormenting and expelling Palestinian
Christians. To date, unfortunately, the Episcopalian,
Evangelical Lutheran, Methodist, and Presbyterian churches,
as well as the United Church of Christ, have ignored the
problem.

Instead, they pursue the self-indulgent path of venting
moral outrage against the Israeli bystander and even
withdrawing their investment funds from it. As they obsess
with Israel but stay silent about Christianity dying in its
birthplace one wonders what it will take to awaken them. |
_______________

September 12, 2005
United Methodist Church kicks off
television ad campaign

In sharp contrast to the
cynical "bouncer" ads from the United Church of Christ, the United
Methodist Church's new television ad
"Open hearts. Open minds. Open doors."
began running at the end of August as part of a $2 million
campaign. Although the message is similar to the UCC's ad, there's a
big difference in style and delivery. Unlike the UCC ad, the UMC ad
doesn't make sweeping statements about other churches keeping people
out. There's also no manufactured controversy - the ad is running on
cable networks and on local television stations through grants given
to local churches.

_______________

September 9, 2005
Connecticut Conference moving swiftly
on Katrina relief
The Connecticut Conference
of the United Church of Christ, which we regularly criticize for
politically motivated social actions, is doing some great work
providing relief for those who have suffered from the hurricane.
Their plans are ambitious, apolitical and specific - and they should
be acknowledged for the speed in which they are putting together a
practical plan that will have an immediate impact.
From the Connecticut
Conference web site:

| |
Based on the ideas
contributed at a gathering on September 7th, the
Connecticut Conference has selected six focus areas
for its relief efforts:
- We will
support Back Bay Mission in its efforts
to serve the desperate needs in Biloxi, MS,
despite the devastating blow dealt to its own
resources. On September 8th, the Board of
Directors voted to recommend a $1,000,000 goal
to the Conference for inclusion in the Capital
Campaign for Silver Lake, due to be placed
before Conference delegates at the October
Annual Meeting.
- We will
support Housing and Shelter efforts for
the survivors.
- We will
develop relationships with a Partner Church
or churches in the affected area, so that they
may have additional resources to meet the needs
they are best placed to identify and serve. On
September 8th, the Conference Board of Directors
voted to partner with Central Congregational
Church, United Church of Christ, of New Orleans,
LA, and its pastor, the Rev. Wilmer Brown.
The Conference will:
- hold the
church, its pastor and members in prayer;
- assist
the church with its rebuilding;
- support
the pastor who is currently without income
and benefits as a result of the flood;
- help the
members of the church rebuild their lives
and homes;
- and
continue in a longterm partnership that we
trust will be mutually enriching and deeply
shared.
- We will
strive to coordinate Work Teams from our
local congregations to address the rebuilding
needs from Katrina when the area can accept
them, and encourage teams to work in other storm
distressed areas (such as Florida) at the
present.
- We will
Advocate for the needs of the most
distressed and oppressed with government and
social agencies.
- We will
Raise Funds for the aid of the survivors
here in the nation's wealthiest state per
capita.
|
|
_______________

September 9, 2005
Edgar and Wallis continue to
politicize crisis in Sudan
Bob Edgar of the National
Council of Churches and Jim Wallis of Sojourners Magazine are again
trying to politicize the crisis in Sudan. According to
Political Affairs Magazine:

| |
Rev. Dr. Robert W. Edgar,
General Secretary of the National Council of Churches, said,
"It is unacceptable for us to sit idly by as people die.
This is true whether it is in the Deep South or Darfur,
Sudan. This genocide is one of the greatest horrors of our
day. We urge people of conscience everywhere to call on our
leaders to take action now before events force us to one day
have to confess our sin of negligence and complicity."

Today’s event also saw the release of a petition signed by
many tens of thousands of Americans, calling on the
President to act urgently to provide protection to the
people of Darfur. Across the country, citizen engagement on
the crisis in Darfur continues to grow, as Americans raise
their voices to emphasize that genocide cannot be ignored.

Rev. Jim Wallis, Founder an Editor-in-Chief of Sojourners
Magazine, said today, "People of faith are united in their
call for bold and immediate Presidential leadership in order
to restore hope and security to the people of Darfur. Now is
the time to put real meaning behind the words 'never
again'." |

The U.S. government has
been a world leader on the crisis and is one of only a few countries
to call the tragedy genocide. The roadblock for aid to Sudan is not
the United States. Clearly and without doubt, the problem lies in
the United Nations which has found itself paralyzed by the crisis in
Sudan. Last July, the
Washington Post decried the U.N.'s lack of action and it is
obvious that any honest and faithful response to the crisis must be
directed to the United Nations. Suggesting that the problem is with
the White House, as Edgar and Wallis have done, is neither honest
nor faithful.
_______________

September 8, 2005
UCC 'Katrina' relief efforts turn
political... and racial
You knew it was going to
happen eventually. The United Church of Christ's Justice and Peace
Action Network has linked it's campaign against decreases to the
Estate Tax being considered by Congress to relief efforts for the
victims of Hurricane Katrina... and even suggests that the disaster
somehow exposes problems with "race and class". From the JPAnet
Action Alert emailed today:

| |
Hurricane Katrina has dramatically exposed problems of race
and class in our nation, and we must raise these critical
questions in the months to come. We have seen
with our own eyes the thousands of Americans who were
failed by local, state and federal government rescue
efforts. We also have seen how, in reality, they had
already been abandoned by a
government infrastructure that fails to provide basic social
services. Even as members of Congress return from the August
recess, they are preparing to consider a measure to repeal
the estate tax. Proposals for further tax cuts in a
time of such widespread need would further undermine an
already weakened infrastructure. |
_______________

September 8, 2005
Funk is Dead
_______________

September 2, 2005
How You Can Help The Victims of
Hurricane Katrina

|
Source: Charity
Navigator
|
|
4-Star
Rated Charities Assisting in the
Relief Effort
|
- Give To An
Established Charity:
Don't let an unscrupulous charity take
advantage of your goodwill. Find a
charity with a proven track record of
success with dealing with this region
and this type of disaster. Avoid
fly-by-night charities created
specifically to deal with Hurricane
Katrina relief efforts. Even
well-meaning new organizations will not
have the infrastructure and knowledge of
the region to efficiently maximize your
gift. If you do feel compelled to give
to a new charity, be sure to get proof
that the group is in fact a registered
public charity with 501 (c) (3) status.
- Designate
Your Gift:
Worried that your
donation will go towards the charity's
general operating fund or saved for an
upcoming crisis? This is a very
understandable concern. Many charities
do encourage donors not to designate
their gifts so that the charity can
decide how best to utilize the money,
but depending on your confidence in the
charity's ability to make that
determination, you may want to tell the
charity exactly how to use your gift. By
designating your gift specifically for
Hurricane Katrina relief efforts, you'll
ensure that your donation will be used
for the victims of this particular
disaster.
- Avoid
Telemarketers:
Be wary of fundraisers who pressure you
to make a contribution over the phone.
Never divulge your credit card
information to someone soliciting you
via the phone. Instead, ask the
fundraiser to send you written
information about the charity they
represent and do some research on your
own. Once you feel comfortable with the
charity, send the organization a check
directly in the mail, or give through
their website, thus ensuring 100% of
your gift goes to the charity and not
the for-profit fundraiser.
Read Charity Navigator's
Guide to Handling Telephone Appeals
- Research And
Follow Up:
As always, take the time to find a
charity you can trust. Charity Navigator
offers this list of highly-rated
charities working in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina to help you in your
efforts. Use our free financial
evaluations to search for other well-run
charities worthy of your support. And be
sure to follow up with the charity in a
few months to find out (a) how your
donation was put to use and (b) if they
need additional support to complete the
recovery effort.
|
|
|

|
|
|
|